From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NmXwT-0005Wx-Hg for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 02 Mar 2010 19:39:41 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0A290E0F35; Tue, 2 Mar 2010 19:39:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA188E0F2D for ; Tue, 2 Mar 2010 19:39:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.3] (g225028149.adsl.alicedsl.de [92.225.28.149]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14F161B41FC for ; Tue, 2 Mar 2010 19:39:33 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4B8D6973.1070900@gentoo.org> Date: Tue, 02 Mar 2010 20:39:31 +0100 From: Sebastian Pipping User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.7) Gecko/20100228 Thunderbird/3.0.1 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Marking bugs for bugday? References: <4B889D1F.3040304@gentoo.org> <201002282154.35130.hwoarang@gentoo.org> <4B8ACC34.7000600@gentoo.org> <20100228173504.78eea0b1@angelstorm> <20100302010205.18765d7s0e4x781s@webmail.df.eu> <4B8D6229.1090402@gentoo.org> <19341.25661.876659.838226@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <4B8D66E3.9000103@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <4B8D66E3.9000103@gentoo.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 7cc5764e-3098-489c-b7f1-82c14d92aa2a X-Archives-Hash: 3387c18f0856342abcb15a72ca8d8f64 On 03/02/10 20:28, Nathan Zachary wrote: >> This looks like overkill to me. One keyword should be enough, and for >> supplementary information "Status Whiteboard" could be used. >> > I agree. Simply having the BUGDAY keyword should be sufficient, and > more information can be provided elsewhere in the report. If more than one keyword is commonly considered overkill I would at least request the whiteboard for it: "somewhere in the report" involves more than zero searching for it. Sebastian