From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NmXlL-0003lW-4J for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 02 Mar 2010 19:28:11 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2A628E0EA6; Tue, 2 Mar 2010 19:28:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from themis.wsgurus.com (themis.wsgurus.com [65.98.70.26]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9585DE0E9F for ; Tue, 2 Mar 2010 19:28:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from adsl-70-253-170-117.dsl.stlsmo.swbell.net ([70.253.170.117] helo=[192.168.1.240]) by themis.wsgurus.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NmXl2-00031W-3n for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Tue, 02 Mar 2010 14:27:28 -0500 Message-ID: <4B8D66E3.9000103@gentoo.org> Date: Tue, 02 Mar 2010 13:28:35 -0600 From: Nathan Zachary User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.7) Gecko/20100225 Thunderbird/3.0.1 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Marking bugs for bugday? References: <4B889D1F.3040304@gentoo.org> <201002282154.35130.hwoarang@gentoo.org> <4B8ACC34.7000600@gentoo.org> <20100228173504.78eea0b1@angelstorm> <20100302010205.18765d7s0e4x781s@webmail.df.eu> <4B8D6229.1090402@gentoo.org> <19341.25661.876659.838226@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> In-Reply-To: <19341.25661.876659.838226@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------060609000901020500040702" X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - themis.wsgurus.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - lists.gentoo.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - gentoo.org X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: X-Archives-Salt: 8e5426f1-ec1d-4766-8a7c-a769f618c1a7 X-Archives-Hash: 43d5fc78f34e4c77c1596a9c6e433b45 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------060609000901020500040702 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 02/03/10 13:17, Ulrich Mueller wrote: >>>>>> On Tue, 02 Mar 2010, Sebastian Pipping wrote: >>>>>> > >> To make naming a bit more consistent, how about: >> - BUGDAY-CANDIDATE >> - BUGDAY-ACCEPTED >> - BUGDAY-REFUSED >> > >> They're a bit long but I think it's worth to not have them crippled >> down to stuff like "BDYES", "BDNO" and "BDMAYBE". >> > This looks like overkill to me. One keyword should be enough, and for > supplementary information "Status Whiteboard" could be used. > > Ulrich > > I agree. Simply having the BUGDAY keyword should be sufficient, and more information can be provided elsewhere in the report. --Zach --------------060609000901020500040702 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 02/03/10 13:17, Ulrich Mueller wrote:

On Tue, 02 Mar 2010, Sebastian Pipping wrote:

To make naming a bit more consistent, how about:
- BUGDAY-CANDIDATE
- BUGDAY-ACCEPTED
- BUGDAY-REFUSED

They're a bit long but I think it's worth to not have them crippled
down to stuff like "BDYES", "BDNO" and "BDMAYBE".

This looks like overkill to me. One keyword should be enough, and for
supplementary information "Status Whiteboard" could be used.

Ulrich

I agree. Simply having the BUGDAY keyword should be sufficient, and more information can be provided elsewhere in the report.

--Zach
--------------060609000901020500040702--