From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-39634-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
id 1NmENa-00024D-Js
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 01 Mar 2010 22:46:23 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 675C0E0C17;
Mon, 1 Mar 2010 22:46:20 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-fx0-f222.google.com (mail-fx0-f222.google.com [209.85.220.222])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07E1AE0C02
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 1 Mar 2010 22:46:16 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by fxm22 with SMTP id 22so3081194fxm.26
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 01 Mar 2010 14:46:16 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from
:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to
:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=5X1SzDT5fo5p+erywuAvjyj83uWn26fY7qFFbztg+fM=;
b=l5Umu37FjsLal+QuCBaxDUgMV2GAd6jLfAoCQeD+QNKtkpXXW+xhBuQ0rAFFsJGpSh
QMfE9Ize6tMD7rb1JA03ndG0ls/zi4Gpn1Fm7WvIwzIA70I8C78ETRrEPJJJ62sLCUJI
I9HO8n3ow9dqhyp1Wblcnxk1moYKi2zJQK85M=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references
:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
b=slUhlSKlH1oO9/H1X6wBE70cnN5cJL+z11AHybDLDB6jwLb7iUmUWygY0hK+/AoRB9
EEsntYz20R3il0FvPc2YBcz+Zt/oS4TGVAOiX5zK3yc/BWBjOs+ufpGBTor1JIU042bC
G3Kb7vqjuTg69FYhy1ETNWkE8mO87zBdBP9CE=
Received: by 10.223.5.156 with SMTP id 28mr5752480fav.74.1267483575899;
Mon, 01 Mar 2010 14:46:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?192.168.1.18? ([95.147.55.110])
by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 14sm2522737fxm.5.2010.03.01.14.46.14
(version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5);
Mon, 01 Mar 2010 14:46:15 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <4B8C43B7.8060400@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2010 22:46:15 +0000
From: George Prowse <george.prowse@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-GB; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100216 Thunderbird/3.0.2
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Marking bugs for bugday?
References: <4B889D1F.3040304@gentoo.org> <201002282154.35130.hwoarang@gentoo.org> <4B8ACC34.7000600@gentoo.org> <20100228173504.78eea0b1@angelstorm> <ea440b1d1003011317j24a550b2id2653d8061757c94@mail.gmail.com> <e117dbb91003011419if3b25fnef03dc6c0e86e69d@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <e117dbb91003011419if3b25fnef03dc6c0e86e69d@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Archives-Salt: c7830de0-5ed3-4cce-8956-822175885dc2
X-Archives-Hash: 2db5be870bda7ec68a2541277d9e880f
On 01/03/2010 22:19, Ben de Groot wrote:
> On 1 March 2010 22:17, Ioannis Aslanidis<aslanidis@gmail.com> wrote:
>> [...]
>
> Great ideas!
>
>> The teams should send the list of
>> bugs, with each bug filling a skeleton similar to the following:
>>
>> * Ticket number.
>> * Title.
>> * Clear, easy to understand, short description of what we want to
>> delegate to our users.
>> * Topic of the task (as in networking, C/C++, python, ebuild, etc.).
>> * Difficulty of the task.
>> * Detailed step-by-step description of the task.
>
> This will not work. You need to keep things really simple for our devs.
> I don't see anybody but the most dedicated ones, who also happen
> to have a lot of time on their hands, fill out such a detailed form.
>
> I'd say let devs just nominate bugs, either by adding BugDay to
> the keywords field or something similar, or by passing the bugday
> team a list of bug numbers. Then the bugday team can sort these
> and see if any instructions are needed. They could always ask the
> involved devs/teams for more info when necessary.
>
> Cheers,
You don't need to make it compulsory to fill out those fields and if
just 1 out of every 10 or 20 bugs gets that filled then it is still a
big leap forward.
Or... Ask for a dev whose whole job is to fill out those forms. I'm sure
there are plenty of non-coders out there who would be willing to do it,
even a team!