From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Nm2ta-0001tf-HF for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 01 Mar 2010 10:30:38 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 707F7E0762; Mon, 1 Mar 2010 10:30:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38E25E077F for ; Mon, 1 Mar 2010 10:30:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [83.146.207.236] (dyn-207-236-dsl.vsp.fi [83.146.207.236]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61AC61B43BF for ; Mon, 1 Mar 2010 10:30:06 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4B8B991F.5060505@gentoo.org> Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2010 12:38:23 +0200 From: Samuli Suominen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.7) Gecko/20100213 Thunderbird/3.0.1 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] New eclass for x11 packages References: <4B7DC046.7010001@gentoo.org> <4B826172.4010102@gentoo.org> <4B8292C8.90902@gentoo.org> <4B82A7E0.4070501@gentoo.org> <4B82A94C.4050501@gentoo.org> <4B890DB2.3090909@gentoo.org> <4B8B81BE.705@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <4B8B81BE.705@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: b7e8f95e-e4ad-4c84-8cd9-558c738d7081 X-Archives-Hash: 47aabfc001e7fc18ce1e77b173c2b382 On 03/01/2010 10:58 AM, Michael Haubenwallner wrote: >=20 >=20 > Tom=C3=A1=C5=A1 Chv=C3=A1tal wrote: >> and renamed snapshot variable into saner XORG_EAUTORECONF. >=20 >> Does it fit your needs? >=20 > Sane enough for me ;), thank you! >=20 > /haubi/ I'd prefer EAUTORECONF (as it's already used in xfconf.eclass for the same purpose, and has no reason to differ) or even SNAPSHOT, but XORG_ prefix seems redudant - Samuli