From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NlQgl-0001iW-Qh for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 27 Feb 2010 17:42:52 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A665EE0825; Sat, 27 Feb 2010 17:42:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81728E07EF for ; Sat, 27 Feb 2010 17:42:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.3] (e179015115.adsl.alicedsl.de [85.179.15.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8EFD1B4101 for ; Sat, 27 Feb 2010 17:42:45 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4B895993.9090607@gentoo.org> Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2010 18:42:43 +0100 From: Sebastian Pipping User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.7) Gecko/20100131 Thunderbird/3.0.1 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Marking bugs for bugday? References: <4B889D1F.3040304@gentoo.org> <1267285155.3077.1@NeddySeagoon> In-Reply-To: <1267285155.3077.1@NeddySeagoon> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 7e431989-53e3-415f-b52e-8404ed3ec51a X-Archives-Hash: 5813406c9797a94f6601b67f46ed3a35 On 02/27/10 16:39, Roy Bamford wrote: > That sounds good. If it were an enumerated type bugs could be graded > for bugday too. > > .e.g. > Novice > You need to have fixed a few > Intermediate > We don't have a clue. > > I'm not suggesting any grades - those are just for illustration. I had that idea too and found it not too helpful. Potential issues: - Difficulity can be very subjective - Introducing new "levels" later doesn't work well as we'd manually have to go through each bug "left" or "right" of that new level. So we'd have to get it very right the first time. Sebastian