From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NlQdL-0001Hu-1I for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 27 Feb 2010 17:39:19 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6E96FE086B; Sat, 27 Feb 2010 17:39:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A368FE084D for ; Sat, 27 Feb 2010 17:39:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.3] (e179015115.adsl.alicedsl.de [85.179.15.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E93901B4278 for ; Sat, 27 Feb 2010 17:38:59 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4B8958B1.4020706@gentoo.org> Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2010 18:38:57 +0100 From: Sebastian Pipping User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.7) Gecko/20100131 Thunderbird/3.0.1 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Marking bugs for bugday? References: <4B889D1F.3040304@gentoo.org> <20100227162232.GB1733@halcy0n.com> In-Reply-To: <20100227162232.GB1733@halcy0n.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 735d21d1-81e6-41a8-b938-be7240839885 X-Archives-Hash: 48c4870621db84f81e03b05233f37fff On 02/27/10 17:22, Mark Loeser wrote: > I think the goal was to have http://bugday.gentoo.org/ fill this role whenever i visit bugday.gentoo.org it takes minutes to load. afair for the two bugdays i participated it didn't display anything helpful (to me), especially: why does it show fixed bugs, too? about half of them are fixed. section "new, requests for ebuilds, or just a version bump" doesn't have a single bug after 2006, that's how "new" it is. > instead of polluting bugzie with more keywords. would a single keyword be pollution? > I'm not really attached > to one approach over the other, but atleast this little site gives the > users one place to have to check for things and we can categorize them > easily. what i see as an advantage of the bugzilla-keyword approach is that any developer can contribute: everyone (especially bug wranglers) can mark bugs for bugday easily from bugzilla. bugday.gentoo.org could still be used as an entry point showing these bugs. sebastian