From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Nl8z9-0004lv-RK for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 26 Feb 2010 22:48:41 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A6CB9E0ABE; Fri, 26 Feb 2010 22:48:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dev.gentooexperimental.org (dev.gentooexperimental.org [81.93.240.53]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B644E058E for ; Fri, 26 Feb 2010 22:48:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [78.34.185.34] (xdsl-78-34-185-34.netcologne.de [78.34.185.34]) by dev.gentooexperimental.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9584F819216; Fri, 26 Feb 2010 23:48:32 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4B884FC0.5090205@gentoo.org> Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2010 23:48:32 +0100 From: Patrick Lauer User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.7) Gecko/20100213 Thunderbird/3.0.1 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Samuli Suominen CC: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in app-forensics/zzuf: ChangeLog zzuf-0.13.ebuild References: <4B8836EA.5040104@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <4B8836EA.5040104@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 2999efa9-d901-4e74-b811-cb7aa6224d91 X-Archives-Hash: b55449c690a0ae759093257670cdf4d1 On 02/26/10 22:02, Samuli Suominen wrote: > On 02/26/2010 10:50 PM, Patrick Lauer (patrick) wrote: >> src_test() { >> if hasq sandbox ${FEATURES}; then >> ewarn "zzuf tests don't work correctly when sandbox is enabled," >> ewarn "skipping tests. If you want to run the testsuite, please" >> ewarn "disable sandbox for this build." >> return >> fi > > Testing FEATURES from ebuild? You shouldn't do that. I disagree. That's a good way not to fail there, unless someone has a better idea how to make that work. And I'd appreciate it if PMS would stop refusing to document FEATURES. (Double negative? I mean: PMS should document reality) I won't mind if someone "fixes" that in a way that still has the same functionality, but I honestly don't see it as a bug, so I'll leave it as it is.