From: Michael Haubenwallner <haubi@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] New eclass for x11 packages
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2010 11:50:26 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B826172.4010102@gentoo.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4B7DC046.7010001@gentoo.org>
Tomáš Chvátal wrote:
> Hi,
> we prepared new eclass for x11 packages that should be used as
> replacement for x-modular.eclass.
> Prefix support done.
There's one thing I don't find addressed yet:
When some patch[1] necessary for some (prefix-) platform has to touch
configure.ac or Makefile.am, rendering eautoreconf mandatory on
*each* platform, there's no way to tell xorg-2_reconf_source() to
do the eautoreconf instead of elibtoolize *unconditionally*.
We had to have libXaw.ebuild do the eautoreconf unconditionally[2] after
x-modular_src_unpack() - which just did elibtoolize on some platforms,
causing elibtoolize to get run twice, resulting in bug#232820 [3].
Even if libXaw doesn't need those patches any more it seems,
there's no reason such patches won't become necessary again.
[1] http://overlays.gentoo.org/proj/alt/browser/trunk/prefix-overlay/x11-libs/libXaw/files/libXaw-1.0.5-darwin.patch?rev=37037
[2] http://overlays.gentoo.org/proj/alt/browser/trunk/prefix-overlay/x11-libs/libXaw/libXaw-1.0.6.ebuild?rev=49677#L43
[3] http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=232820
/haubi/
PS: Just a suggestion what an ebuild could do in this case:
src_prepare() {
xorg-2_src_prepare --force-eautoreconf
}
--
Michael Haubenwallner
Gentoo on a different level
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-02-22 11:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-02-18 22:33 [gentoo-dev] [RFC] New eclass for x11 packages Tomáš Chvátal
2010-02-18 22:39 ` Jeremy Olexa
2010-02-18 23:04 ` Tomáš Chvátal
2010-02-18 23:06 ` Tomáš Chvátal
2010-02-18 23:11 ` David Leverton
2010-02-18 23:16 ` Tomáš Chvátal
2010-02-18 23:20 ` Tomáš Chvátal
2010-02-18 23:22 ` David Leverton
2010-02-19 1:22 ` [gentoo-dev] " Ryan Hill
2010-02-24 20:54 ` Tomáš Chvátal
2010-02-22 10:50 ` Michael Haubenwallner [this message]
2010-02-22 14:20 ` [gentoo-dev] " Tomáš Chvátal
2010-02-22 15:50 ` Michael Haubenwallner
2010-02-22 15:57 ` Tomáš Chvátal
2010-02-27 12:18 ` Tomáš Chvátal
2010-03-01 8:58 ` Michael Haubenwallner
2010-03-01 10:38 ` Samuli Suominen
2010-03-07 10:52 ` Rémi Cardona
2010-03-10 14:13 ` Tomáš Chvátal
2010-03-10 19:40 ` Dawid Węgliński
2010-03-10 19:42 ` Tomáš Chvátal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4B826172.4010102@gentoo.org \
--to=haubi@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox