Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: ACCEPT_LICENSE and deprecation of check_license

["Petteri Räty" <betelgeuse@gentoo.org>]

On 21.2.2010 14.17, Zac Medico wrote:
> On 02/21/2010 09:08 AM, Petteri Räty wrote:
>> On 20.2.2010 14.28, Zac Medico wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Since portage-2.1.7.x is stable now, with ACCEPT_LICENSE support, we
>>> can think about deprecating check_license [1]. This will allow us to
>>> avoid using PROPERTIES=interactive in cases when it is due to
>>> check_license alone, since anything with a license in the @EULA
>>> license group is automatically masked by the default
>>> ACCEPT_LICENSE="* -@EULA" portage configuration [2].
>>>
>>> [1] http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=299095
>>> [2] http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=302645
>>
>> We could handle it like deprecating ebeep and epause. With EAPI=4 don't
>> define the function any more and the Portage version will be
>> sufficiently new to have ACCEPT_LICENSE.
> 
> That's a good idea. However, we may want to deprecate check_license
> it starting with EAPI=3 since the corresponding portage versions
> already support ACCEPT_LICENSE.

Likely there wouldn't be any breakage with it doing it in EAPI 3 but it
would be against the eclass contract of not changing expected behavior.
Would be a win-win situation if we would get EAPI 4 :)

Regards,
Petteri