From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NZSLP-0000ZP-OO for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 17:03:22 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B17B3E0C74; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 17:03:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from petteriraty.eu (host.petteriraty.eu [188.40.80.83]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F2FAE0C74 for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 17:03:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from Petteri-Ratys-MacBook-Pro.local (unknown [193.185.174.114]) by petteriraty.eu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 795242B58D for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 17:02:59 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4B5DCEC2.6050900@gentoo.org> Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 19:02:58 +0200 From: =?windows-1252?Q?Petteri_R=E4ty?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.1.7) Gecko/20100111 Thunderbird/3.0.1 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] emerge -C eselect-python disaster References: <20100124061239.182027axa254v2kn@mail.junc.org> <4B5CAB65.30408@gentoo.org> <4B5CDFB3.3010108@gmail.com> <2e0007041001241753v3d24abcanc4a82800d33bb0f4@mail.gmail.com> <4B5D01D0.8070800@gmail.com> <4B5D63BA.1000506@gentoo.org> <4B5D7A3F.20003@gmail.com> <4B5D80C5.8050609@gentoo.org> <4B5D8156.4010507@gentoo.org> <2e0007041001250820j47e82830m4ea55b511965456e@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <2e0007041001250820j47e82830m4ea55b511965456e@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: 5f1133ef-3816-4e2f-bcec-5ccc833d75cb X-Archives-Hash: 9851c315740ab0bb06db40e4fec726f3 On 25.1.2010 18.20, Jacob Godserv wrote: > On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 06:32, Petteri R=E4ty w= rote: >> I should also add that this is not a user support mailing list as ther= e's >> gentoo-user for that purpose. I think the original purpose of the thre= ad was >> already fulfilled. > > So then how was the original problem resolved? Sorry, I missed that > (and can't seem to find a resolution in this thread). > There's already an open bug in Portage and the system set won't be=20 changed for this. Regards, Petteri