From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NZ6qK-000358-1E for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 18:05:52 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E5120E0925 for ; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 18:05:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from petteriraty.eu (host.petteriraty.eu [188.40.80.83]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42E41E0838 for ; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 16:53:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [82.130.46.229] (qob5.kyla.fi [82.130.46.229]) by petteriraty.eu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 981A72B22A for ; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 16:53:30 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4B5C7B14.2060902@gentoo.org> Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 18:53:40 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?UGV0dGVyaSBSw6R0eQ==?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; fi; rv:1.8.1.23) Gecko/20090916 Thunderbird/2.0.0.23 Mnenhy/0.7.6.666 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] emerge -C eselect-python disaster References: <20100124061239.182027axa254v2kn@mail.junc.org> <4B5C2A0F.5080202@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0 OpenPGP: url=http://users.tkk.fi/~praty/public.asc Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigDC93ECC5971EF2FDA3D5DA61" X-Archives-Salt: 5f4f6899-bff5-4ce9-a28d-6245efabb758 X-Archives-Hash: 13892cd076092434d1d72065e2982055 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigDC93ECC5971EF2FDA3D5DA61 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 01/24/2010 03:02 PM, Ben de Groot wrote: > 2010/1/24 Petteri R=C3=A4ty : >> The meaning of the system set is to have only the packages directly >> required to have a minimal functioning system. Having python by itself= >> is not a requirement for that but having package management is. >=20 > You can't have functioning package management without the hard > dependencies it requires. So both portage and python should be in the > system set. >=20 > Cheers, Why should we keep redundant information in the list? Regards, Petteri --------------enigDC93ECC5971EF2FDA3D5DA61 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAktcexQACgkQcxLzpIGCsLR0vQCfUIjLME50XX2/bS69k5LbUl7G 5r4An2o/fqiZnSqu2930UBW9egs3XZt7 =BQ/P -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigDC93ECC5971EF2FDA3D5DA61--