From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NPKiT-0000LE-14 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 28 Dec 2009 18:53:17 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E3F0AE09EE; Mon, 28 Dec 2009 18:52:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from petteriraty.eu (host.petteriraty.eu [188.40.80.83]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAB00E09EE for ; Mon, 28 Dec 2009 18:52:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.0.1.11] (qiw3.kyla.fi [82.130.46.203]) by petteriraty.eu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B28D823146 for ; Mon, 28 Dec 2009 18:52:32 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4B38FE6F.4000805@gentoo.org> Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2009 20:52:31 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?UGV0dGVyaSBSw6R0eQ==?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; fi; rv:1.8.1.23) Gecko/20090916 Thunderbird/2.0.0.23 Mnenhy/0.7.6.666 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] x11-libs/lib*: wrong RDEPENDs bug References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0 OpenPGP: url=http://users.tkk.fi/~praty/public.asc Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigD5AF1A7203001362C61AE4F8" X-Archives-Salt: 18a71d34-5e0e-4cb2-81d7-586f8f2946eb X-Archives-Hash: 350ae866130872d7039354a811cc5cbe This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigD5AF1A7203001362C61AE4F8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 12/28/2009 11:10 AM, lxnay@gentoo.org wrote: > To x11, just don't get angry (eheh), let's discuss concerns here > (actually I don't see any and I am willing to fix all the ebuilds and > close all my bugs if you ack). >=20 Filing bugs first and then opening discussion here doesn't make sense. It should be the other way around. Regards, Petteri --------------enigD5AF1A7203001362C61AE4F8 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.13 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAks4/nIACgkQcxLzpIGCsLQ60QCfSAwldlCu8xIBTMRljb27vQP2 jkcAn2CYlUptK0SH+nVIcs4jkFMcaJok =VtKn -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigD5AF1A7203001362C61AE4F8--