From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NOKI4-0001om-0o for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 26 Dec 2009 00:13:52 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9C1C5E0A7F for ; Sat, 26 Dec 2009 00:13:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from petteriraty.eu (host.petteriraty.eu [188.40.80.83]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 030A7E0757 for ; Fri, 25 Dec 2009 23:58:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.0.1.11] (qiw3.kyla.fi [82.130.46.203]) by petteriraty.eu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0A1F0274FC for ; Fri, 25 Dec 2009 23:58:46 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4B3551B7.5040201@gentoo.org> Date: Sat, 26 Dec 2009 01:58:47 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?UGV0dGVyaSBSw6R0eQ==?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; fi; rv:1.8.1.23) Gecko/20090916 Thunderbird/2.0.0.23 Mnenhy/0.7.6.666 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] QA last rites for media-gfx/viewer References: <20091223232939.GA20559@yamato> <4B352389.4050804@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <4B352389.4050804@gentoo.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0 OpenPGP: url=http://users.tkk.fi/~praty/public.asc Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig283280BC7A184093113D0F8E" X-Archives-Salt: 60dad165-2f77-49b9-a48d-5fabf1a5abdd X-Archives-Hash: 44e67a4b5b3b339688fc2d08442d0583 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig283280BC7A184093113D0F8E Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 12/25/2009 10:41 PM, Jeremy Olexa wrote: > James Cloos wrote: >>>>>>> "Diego" =3D=3D Diego E Petten=EF=BF=BD writ= es: >> >> Diego> # Fails to build if /usr/X11R6 is not present (bug #247737, >> >> A bit trivial of an issue to drop a package, ja? >> >> The QA team should generate more patches and fewer kills. >> >> -JimC >=20 > Also, where is the removal notice on bugzilla? I was going to create a > version bump bug that blocked the removal bug but it didn't exist. In > this case, not only did the QA team not create a (seemingly trivial) > patch, but they didn't even follow standard package removal protocol. >=20 > -Jeremy >=20 Standard package removal protocol doesn't mandate opening a removal bug. Treecleaner policy may but that's specific to them. Regards, Petteri --------------enig283280BC7A184093113D0F8E Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.13 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAks1UbsACgkQcxLzpIGCsLRgoACdFlyw0+hISOya4OXO3h5UdEY1 M2kAn1lMtQE4AYS2xer2jwd2MmpBkgRX =nHak -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig283280BC7A184093113D0F8E--