From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NMQC0-0000oV-7l for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 20 Dec 2009 18:07:44 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D8E71E08BA for ; Sun, 20 Dec 2009 18:07:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jolexa.net (jolexa.net [69.164.197.24]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BC26E0540 for ; Sun, 20 Dec 2009 17:40:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: by jolexa.net (Postfix, from userid 5001) id 60C1F5BA1B; Sun, 20 Dec 2009 17:40:49 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.1 (2007-05-02) on sawce.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL autolearn=disabled version=3.2.1 Received: from [192.168.1.110] (c-24-245-20-2.hsd1.mn.comcast.net [24.245.20.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by jolexa.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 046185B9B8 for ; Sun, 20 Dec 2009 17:40:48 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4B2E60BE.1030001@gentoo.org> Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2009 11:37:02 -0600 From: Jeremy Olexa User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20091030) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] January 2010 meeting date References: <7c612fc60912150854k608270cag61c533542075f5bf@mail.gmail.com> <20091220144909.GB840@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <20091220144909.GB840@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: a0222bde-26a4-4bc7-b00d-8208f5ba3306 X-Archives-Hash: a342233461df66cf797a5dbea85f79ba Fabian Groffen wrote: > On 15-12-2009 09:54:36 -0700, Denis Dupeyron wrote: >> I will be following up discussions on various mailing lists to prepare >> the agenda. If you already want to suggest topics feel free to reply >> to this thread. You'll get a second chance with the meeting reminder >> approximately two weeks before the meeting. I will be sending a >> message about the two topics which did not make it last time and >> explain why. I should have sent that much earlier but well... you >> know... > > I'd like to council to discuss the current *$^&!! policy of > -dev-announce and -dev. I'd propose to at least implement the following > behaviour such that I: > - don't have to see some mails 3 (!) times and many 2 times > - don't get lost where the mail is/was > - get broken threading because the original mail was sent to another > list > > Proposed behaviour: > Aautomatically send all mail sent to -dev-announce to -dev. > Benefits: > - any reply-to hackery for -dev-announce to -dev unnecessary > - being subscrived to -dev alone is enough (alternatively -dev-announce > can be /dev/null-ed) > - threads are complete, instead of scattered over some lists > - multiple copies can be avoided > - cross-list posting can be reduced to a minimum > > In general there are too many mail lists to even care about the semantics of -dev-announce. Even this thread is being carried out on -dev and -council. Well, that was the attempt, but no one that has replied so far is on the -council list so the attempted thread on that list is dead too. -Jeremy