From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1N9a9T-0005tf-6w for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 15 Nov 2009 08:08:03 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C2E50E0AE5 for ; Sun, 15 Nov 2009 08:08:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from petteriraty.eu (host.petteriraty.eu [188.40.80.83]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC4BBE0871 for ; Sun, 15 Nov 2009 07:25:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [82.130.46.226] (qob2.kyla.fi [82.130.46.226]) by petteriraty.eu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D619629C91 for ; Sun, 15 Nov 2009 07:25:42 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4AFFACF9.6000905@gentoo.org> Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2009 09:25:45 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?UGV0dGVyaSBSw6R0eQ==?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; fi; rv:1.8.1.23) Gecko/20090916 Thunderbird/2.0.0.23 Mnenhy/0.7.6.666 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 27 Bump References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.96.0 OpenPGP: url=http://users.tkk.fi/~praty/public.asc Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig567C30A29D122A3C57F2088B" X-Archives-Salt: cf1257c3-de9d-4c27-8b85-bff6bab8fe50 X-Archives-Hash: 64a3d14a3e78107342c8f22485c09377 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig567C30A29D122A3C57F2088B Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Doug Goldstein wrote: > GLEP 27 [1] seems pretty stagnant and I'm planning on giving it a bit > of a refresh and actually implementing it. Now before I do this I'm > not in love with the format in tree but I haven't decided on a format > exactly in my head. So that being said, I'm sending this out looking > for some opinions or ideas for my new GLEP. One of the obvious things > I'll cover is all the ambiguity of the GLEP with regard to the data > inside each of the files. >=20 > [1] http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/glep/glep-0027.html >=20 One idea worth considering is making users just ebuilds with a supporting eclass. Regards, Petteri --------------enig567C30A29D122A3C57F2088B Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.13 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkr/rP0ACgkQcxLzpIGCsLTAdgCfVKb0uJu6FEtSEw+AdjK5FjPJ J3QAn1c/7gxP3awkU32aPZUrTzhALgDX =XscW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig567C30A29D122A3C57F2088B--