From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1N68hI-0007fA-Ez for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 05 Nov 2009 20:12:44 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 543CEE0C90; Thu, 5 Nov 2009 20:12:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from petteriraty.eu (host.petteriraty.eu [188.40.80.83]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 266A4E0C90 for ; Thu, 5 Nov 2009 20:12:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [82.130.46.226] (qob2.kyla.fi [82.130.46.226]) by petteriraty.eu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3483129B30 for ; Thu, 5 Nov 2009 20:12:42 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4AF331B0.4020108@gentoo.org> Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2009 22:12:32 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?UGV0dGVyaSBSw6R0eQ==?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; fi; rv:1.8.1.23) Gecko/20090916 Thunderbird/2.0.0.23 Mnenhy/0.7.6.666 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Improve policy of stabilizations References: <200911011736.38401.Arfrever@gentoo.org> <20091102151707.0b155aab@gentoo.org> <200911021724.01069.hwoarang@gentoo.org> <20091103191005.18d98e2e@gentoo.org> <4AF1EBD8.4020502@gentoo.org> <20091104214823.64842abd@gentoo.org> <20091105091700.GA17478@eric.schwarzvogel.de> In-Reply-To: <20091105091700.GA17478@eric.schwarzvogel.de> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.96.0 OpenPGP: url=http://users.tkk.fi/~praty/public.asc Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig5B0A4930B4B808C118D41697" X-Archives-Salt: 4aed64c7-b4e7-4fe4-8a40-9caab5f83f97 X-Archives-Hash: 06b8c541a9c94180972deb38127ee958 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig5B0A4930B4B808C118D41697 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Tobias Klausmann wrote: > Hi!=20 >=20 > On Wed, 04 Nov 2009, Ryan Hill wrote: >> Is there any interest in allowing certain packages to be stabilized by= the >> maintainer without going through the arch teams? I always feel guilty= when i >> file stabilization bugs for app-doc pkgs. >=20 > I think for bugs which only install passive files (i.e. stuff > that doesn't "power" anything else), Keywording can be done by the > maintainer. Pure doc files (like selfhtml) are in that category. >=20 In the past when smaller arches were not that active we used to mark Java packages stable after testing by at least one arch team. The probability to find arch specific issues in something like Java is not so high so I think arrangements like this are acceptable when the arch teams have problems keeping up. Regards, Petteri --------------enig5B0A4930B4B808C118D41697 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.13 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkrzMbMACgkQcxLzpIGCsLRRvgCfWturHuhNy4jULNBBR17b5T5E 02UAnjWSiSwCm9q7+Or6JRQDYoDXRO9I =ONFu -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig5B0A4930B4B808C118D41697--