From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1N2loL-0002vX-Ib for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 27 Oct 2009 13:10:05 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D62BAE07F2; Tue, 27 Oct 2009 13:10:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from petteriraty.eu (host.petteriraty.eu [188.40.80.83]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6101E07F2 for ; Tue, 27 Oct 2009 13:10:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [82.130.46.226] (qob2.kyla.fi [82.130.46.226]) by petteriraty.eu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 71167295A4 for ; Tue, 27 Oct 2009 13:10:02 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4AE6F11C.9010804@gentoo.org> Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 15:09:48 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?UGV0dGVyaSBSw6R0eQ==?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; fi; rv:1.8.1.23) Gecko/20090916 Thunderbird/2.0.0.23 Mnenhy/0.7.6.666 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] Unused ebuild built_with_use cleanup References: <4AC20C83.3050904@gentoo.org> <4AE41EF7.5020508@gentoo.org> <20091027000702.0c644123@gentoo.org> <200910270302.17808.vapier@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <200910270302.17808.vapier@gentoo.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.96.0 OpenPGP: url=http://users.tkk.fi/~praty/public.asc Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig208B8EDEAFE4CEB9AA88CDA5" X-Archives-Salt: b9ea5666-78b5-4dd0-b610-6dc75064dff4 X-Archives-Hash: caf7f7c7d8310b9c2751c46cedaa0e40 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig208B8EDEAFE4CEB9AA88CDA5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Tuesday 27 October 2009 02:07:02 Ryan Hill wrote: >> On Sun, 25 Oct 2009 11:48:39 +0200 Petteri R=C3=A4ty wrote: >>> James Cloos wrote: >>>> When you first psoted this list I noticed some (or several?) live >>>> ebuilds. Git-9999 is the one I remember. >>>> >>>> Those should not get nuked during global cleanups, as they are likel= y >>>> to be in active use notwithstanding their keywording or masking. >>> Their maintainers should be active and switch their ebuilds to EAPI 2= =2E >>> If they don't have an active maintainer, then do we want to keep live= >>> ebuilds for them around? >> Your stated goal was to remove unused ebuilds, which live ebuilds are = not, >> regardless of the status of the maintainer. And I'm pretty sure git h= as an >> active maintainer. :P >=20 > indeed. you really should file bugs for these instead of deleting ebui= lds on=20 > people who missed a thread on gentoo-dev. > -mike All developers are required to follow gentoo-dev-announce. If they don't follow that, it can't be expected for them to follow bugzilla either. Regards, Petteri --------------enig208B8EDEAFE4CEB9AA88CDA5 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.13 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkrm8SEACgkQcxLzpIGCsLRiVwCdHT5mmnjmMtS8lOwiP58iXJal MEwAn3HLoaXGN5OtINBNAZUHWdFxFy1c =RzAz -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig208B8EDEAFE4CEB9AA88CDA5--