From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1N2NUD-0000wk-Vc for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 26 Oct 2009 11:11:42 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 74AB9E08ED; Mon, 26 Oct 2009 11:11:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5592AE08ED for ; Mon, 26 Oct 2009 11:11:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.101] (dyn-207-11-dsl.vsp.fi [83.146.207.11]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77398673BF for ; Mon, 26 Oct 2009 11:11:39 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4AE583EA.7060804@gentoo.org> Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 13:11:38 +0200 From: Samuli Suominen User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090828) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Splitting desktop profile to KDE and GNOME References: <200910241542.17701.reavertm@gmail.com> <4AE582D0.7080405@allenjb.me.uk> In-Reply-To: <4AE582D0.7080405@allenjb.me.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1250 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 196aa991-4fda-4de1-a36b-47c05622f1b0 X-Archives-Hash: 3b13e786cb61e163851385968880a7b0 AllenJB wrote: > * Why is the developer profile even shown on "eselect profile"? Wouldn't > it be better to keep "unsupported" profiles off this list. Surely Gentoo > devs can cope with setting their profile manually in favor of a little > sanity preservation for the rest of us? It's not only for Gentoo developers, but for /Software/ developers in general. IMHO.