From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1My75U-0008Bj-J9 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 14 Oct 2009 16:52:32 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 08486E08E5; Wed, 14 Oct 2009 16:52:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tommyserver.de (unknown [85.14.198.50]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C37B2E08E5 for ; Wed, 14 Oct 2009 16:52:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.178.22] (Q4455.q.pppool.de [89.53.68.85]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by tommyserver.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D8DAC40EF36 for ; Wed, 14 Oct 2009 18:52:30 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4AD601CC.4060503@gentoo.org> Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 18:52:28 +0200 From: Thomas Sachau Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] openrc-0.5.1 arrived in the tree References: <200910091957.09193.zzam@gentoo.org> <200910140052.06682.cla@gentoo.org> <4AD53458.1040202@avtomatika.com> <200910132022.58491.vapier@gentoo.org> <4AD5393C.1060306@avtomatika.com> In-Reply-To: <4AD5393C.1060306@avtomatika.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7 OpenPGP: id=211CA2D4 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigF59810B5777D285206765624" X-Archives-Salt: f5089a43-a911-40d4-95e2-f71de6999b97 X-Archives-Hash: 55de882bf0734ae64ab792fa6256ba2a This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigF59810B5777D285206765624 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Branko Badrljica schrieb: > Mike Frysinger wrote: >> >> the mailing list is not bugzilla. any complaints you have about >> USE=3Doldnet have nothing to do with this thread. it's a bug and shou= ld >> be treated as such. >> -mike >> =20 >=20 > Which is why I have posted here to gripe about having documented such > changes in future. >=20 > I was told that new openrc is surely fine because it works for some > group of people, that obviously includes developer. >=20 > It is not enough, and please, don't keep such things in the future in > more or less closed circles of your pals. >=20 > Even simple "WARNING!!! Big changes, untested, not(yet) documented!" > would be nice. >=20 > I know what arch~ _should_ mean, but you know what it actually means. > So, a little bit of pragmatic flexibility here would certainly decreas= e > amount of raining urine and improve Gentoo's likability. Using TESTING packages actually means the above big warning. But do you r= eally want to annoy every user with such a message everywhere, just because some people expect TEST= ING tree to be similar save as stable tree? --=20 Thomas Sachau Gentoo Linux Developer --------------enigF59810B5777D285206765624 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.13 (GNU/Linux) iJwEAQEKAAYFAkrWAcwACgkQG7kqcTWJkGeZ+QP9E1U0fS2OtLAdqh1oODEcNaAd mA0Pvpb5eSav2QNwnCGkK5JCQhi+smesxNZsO4pf+toa+YabclUz4nirvLprG2Sp HSx26r8MdraiGVMHUf4wjwqFW8UiIKhTp0CCimny5sDWyxZ9mwRZWrQBdxEJzwI6 jGXHsJcJAy+DJCzk6NU= =gyKn -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigF59810B5777D285206765624--