public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Branko Badrljica <brankob@avtomatika.com>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] openrc-0.5.1 arrived in the tree
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 01:33:27 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4AD50E47.1080106@avtomatika.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4AD4E907.5060405@gentoo.org>

Thomas Sachau wrote:


<SNIP>
>
> I disagree in this place. ~arch is called testing because it actually is about TESTING new versions
> and packages. You should expect problems and you should be able to recover from them and you should
> be able to use bugzilla. Else i suggest you move to a stable arch instead.
>
> Your arguments could make sense, if it would be about the stable tree, but forcing the testing tree
> to be a second stable tree, just with newer package versions isnt our goal nor does it help anyone.
>
>   
1. Much of the time on Gentoo using of ~ packages is not user explicit 
choice but forced compromise.
I don't remember exactly anymore what prompted me to enter openrc in 
package.keywords, but I surely remember having a few headaches with it.
Same is with many other packages- many times using ~arch is the only 
answer, so 99% of the time it is used for getting some package to work 
and not for pure testing.
Having in mind state of the matter in_real_world, I really don't think 
that having such things at least temporarily masked ( not to mention 
DOCUMENTED!) is really not overdoing it.

2. About using bugzilla- how the heck was I supposed to use it without 
net access ?

3. My main if not only argument was about at last documenting such changes.

As it was done, it presented me with nasty surprise. Machine has gotten 
through upgrade world just fine and only after reboot it couldn't start 
network interfaces. Manual restart croaked with some error about python 
not being able to find some function.

It felt exactly like a few last times when my ext4 decided to lose a few 
hundred essential system files. There was nothing to suggest openrc. 
After I lost some time reemerging system files and sifting through 
ebuilds, packages and scripts, that casual message here about new openrc 
hit me purely by chance, otherwise I would be in for much more pain.
After I got system running again, I couldn't find anywhere anything at 
all about any substantial change in openrc.
Not on bugzilla, not on openrc home page nor anywhere else.


4. About filing bugzilla bug, I can't do it now, since I am in a hurry 
and without it I can't contribute any really useful data.
Will do when I get around to it...
 








  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-10-13 21:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-10-09 17:57 [gentoo-dev] openrc-0.5.1 arrived in the tree Matthias Schwarzott
2009-10-09 19:21 ` Alexey Shvetsov
2009-10-10  2:11 ` Joshua Saddler
2009-10-10  9:53   ` Branko Badrljica
2009-10-10 15:08     ` William Hubbs
2009-10-10 13:12 ` Alin Năstac
2009-10-10 13:22   ` Nirbheek Chauhan
2009-10-10 20:30     ` Matthias Schwarzott
2009-10-13 15:23       ` Markos Chandras
2009-10-13 18:10         ` Matthias Schwarzott
2009-10-13 18:16         ` William Hubbs
2009-10-13 20:55           ` Branko Badrljica
2009-10-13 19:17             ` Jeremy Olexa
2009-10-13 19:17             ` William Hubbs
2009-10-13 19:28               ` Nirbheek Chauhan
2009-10-13 21:43               ` Branko Badrljica
2009-10-13 20:54                 ` Thomas Sachau
2009-10-13 23:30                   ` Joshua Saddler
2009-10-14  0:17                     ` Mike Frysinger
2009-10-14  0:33                       ` Mark Loeser
2009-10-14  0:48                         ` Mike Frysinger
2009-10-14  1:10                         ` Jeroen Roovers
2009-10-14 11:19                           ` Nirbheek Chauhan
2009-10-14 11:24                             ` Tomáš Chvátal
2009-10-18 23:20                               ` [gentoo-dev] " Christian Faulhammer
2009-10-14 11:38                             ` [gentoo-dev] " Samuli Suominen
2009-10-14 11:56                               ` Nirbheek Chauhan
2009-10-14 16:48                         ` Thomas Sachau
2009-10-14  6:12                       ` Eray Aslan
2009-10-14  6:34                         ` Mike Frysinger
2009-10-14  6:48                         ` Maciej Mrozowski
2009-10-14 16:28                     ` Thomas Sachau
2009-10-13 23:33                   ` Branko Badrljica [this message]
2009-10-13 22:15                     ` Mike Frysinger
2009-10-14  0:41                       ` Branko Badrljica
2009-10-13 22:52                         ` Dawid Węgliński
2009-10-13 22:59                           ` schism
2009-10-13 23:03                             ` Dawid Węgliński
2009-10-13 23:17                               ` schism
2009-10-14  0:27                                 ` Matthias Schwarzott
2009-10-13 23:15                             ` Mike Frysinger
2009-10-13 23:22                           ` Joshua Saddler
2009-10-14  2:15                           ` Branko Badrljica
2009-10-14  0:22                             ` Mike Frysinger
2009-10-14  2:36                               ` Branko Badrljica
2009-10-14  0:40                                 ` Mike Frysinger
2009-10-14  1:26                                   ` schism
2009-10-14  1:44                                     ` Mike Frysinger
2009-10-14  2:48                                   ` Branko Badrljica
2009-10-14  0:51                                     ` Mike Frysinger
2009-10-14  2:57                                       ` Branko Badrljica
2009-10-14 16:52                                 ` Thomas Sachau
2009-10-13 23:15                         ` Mike Frysinger
2009-10-13 22:23                     ` William Hubbs
2009-10-14  6:02                     ` Graham Murray
2009-10-13 21:13                 ` William Hubbs
2009-10-10 19:41 ` Tomáš Chvátal
2009-10-10 23:29 ` [gentoo-dev] " Duncan
2009-10-14  0:32 ` [gentoo-dev] " Mike Frysinger
2009-11-07  0:05   ` Ed W

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4AD50E47.1080106@avtomatika.com \
    --to=brankob@avtomatika.com \
    --cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox