From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MtiHt-0003M0-Fo for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 02 Oct 2009 13:35:09 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D18A2E05D9; Fri, 2 Oct 2009 13:35:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vms173015pub.verizon.net (vms173015pub.verizon.net [206.46.173.15]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1837E05D9 for ; Fri, 2 Oct 2009 13:35:07 +0000 (UTC) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Received: from gw.thefreemanclan.net ([96.245.54.239]) by vms173015.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-7.04 (built Sep 26 2008; 32bit)) with ESMTPA id <0KQW009E7327RWI4@vms173015.mailsrvcs.net> for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Fri, 02 Oct 2009 08:35:07 -0500 (CDT) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gw.thefreemanclan.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D6771759AE0 for ; Fri, 02 Oct 2009 09:34:53 -0400 (EDT) Message-id: <4AC6017A.1010300@gentoo.org> Date: Fri, 02 Oct 2009 09:34:50 -0400 From: Richard Freeman User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090912) To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Xorg 1.6/libxcb 1.4 stabilization news item References: <4AC5142E.5060900@gentoo.org> <4AC54CE5.40308@gmail.com> <4AC5A328.9080206@gentoo.org> <19141.44839.67502.305568@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <4AC5B59D.3060006@gentoo.org> <4AC5B82D.9000600@gentoo.org> <4AC5C870.5050402@gentoo.org> In-reply-to: <4AC5C870.5050402@gentoo.org> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: ef947816-c994-469d-b69b-9ad03400d189 X-Archives-Hash: a8285648b0832bc27a22ef0b9539ce6c R=C3=A9mi Cardona wrote: > May I request a faster commit time since I didn't expect Samuli to=20 > stabilize everything so quickly? >=20 Yup - I wouldn't be surprised if within a few hours 80% of the concerned=20 users will have already installed it. Even if you send out the news now=20 anybody who synced overnight wouldn't get it in time anyway. Might not hurt to log a blocker bug just to track the news item the next=20 time you consider a major upgrade like this. Then you don't actually=20 stabilize anything until AFTER the news goes out. :)