From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MmuvS-0006XL-1V for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 13 Sep 2009 19:39:54 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F3528E09BD; Sun, 13 Sep 2009 19:39:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtprelay07.ispgateway.de (smtprelay07.ispgateway.de [80.67.29.7]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD958E09BD for ; Sun, 13 Sep 2009 19:39:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [85.179.7.249] (helo=[192.168.0.3]) by smtprelay07.ispgateway.de with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1MmuvP-0004Sn-Vc for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Sun, 13 Sep 2009 21:39:52 +0200 Message-ID: <4AAD4A87.7010302@hartwork.org> Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 21:39:51 +0200 From: Sebastian Pipping User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (X11/20090820) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] DistroWatch and Gentoo packages: status quo and future References: <4AAAD714.1010107@hartwork.org> <4b0462b4d4cc0f26a7b45e6787d51890@localhost> <4AACCDBF.5020207@gentoo.org> <99cec4046b6897dbff2e733ee0ab8dab@localhost> <4AACF2A7.4080404@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <4AACF2A7.4080404@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Df-Sender: 874396 X-Archives-Salt: 72e69609-31c6-488d-b656-e632d566be9b X-Archives-Hash: e82e27900d63dc2cd5ef48d52a0fea52 Richard Freeman wrote: > Personally, I like the overlay idea, but right now it just isn't > necessary. In theory proxy maintainers work almost as well, and we're > not really making heavy use of this model right now. I disagree about this. One of the reasons my overlay is fun to me is because I am _not_ proxied. Sebastian