From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Mjsyn-0006kE-Qd for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 05 Sep 2009 10:58:50 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B3481E0B1C; Sat, 5 Sep 2009 10:58:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EA3BE0B1C for ; Sat, 5 Sep 2009 10:58:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.22.10] (ip68-4-152-120.oc.oc.cox.net [68.4.152.120]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 174B864859 for ; Sat, 5 Sep 2009 10:58:48 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4AA244AF.2060403@gentoo.org> Date: Sat, 05 Sep 2009 03:59:59 -0700 From: Zac Medico User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (X11/20090605) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Add operator + for licenses (EAPI-4 ?) References: <4A9C4AD6.9080505@gentoo.org> <4A9C853D.8050003@hartwork.org> <4AA03037.7000203@gentoo.org> <4AA18272.7070509@hartwork.org> <4AA1B981.9020002@gentoo.org> <19106.12109.636129.925776@a1ihome1.kph.uni-mainz.de> In-Reply-To: <19106.12109.636129.925776@a1ihome1.kph.uni-mainz.de> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: b0fb9cc0-fd9a-4d18-8d64-9cc341fdcc37 X-Archives-Hash: 104b6e17b27358cb25ad59e207baf7a5 Ulrich Mueller wrote: >>>>>> On Fri, 04 Sep 2009, Zac Medico wrote: >>> I propose support for license groups in ebuilds then, I guess. > >> That seems like a reasonable solution. So, an ebuild can do >> something like LICENSE="@GPL-2+" and that will expand to whatever >> the definition of the GPL-2+ license group happens to be. > > So "@GPL-2+" would (currently) expand to "GPL-2 GPL-3". But that would > be wrong, since what you want is "|| ( GPL-2 GPL-3 )". Right, so naturally, license groups inside LICENSE should expand to || ( licenses in group ). -- Thanks, Zac