From: "Rémi Cardona" <remi@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Add operator + for licenses (EAPI-4 ?)
Date: Fri, 04 Sep 2009 22:04:46 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4AA172DE.80104@gentoo.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200909041952.12314.levertond@googlemail.com>
Le 04/09/2009 20:52, David Leverton a écrit :
> Is that really a problem?
To me, it's not. :)
> I admit to not being around for the original design
> decisions, but I would assume that the purpose of having LICENSE in ebuilds
> is to tell users what licence the package is under (whether or not it's
> accurate is a different matter), and the purpose of having the licences
> themselves in the tree is so that it's easy for users to look them up and
> decide whether they want to accept the conditions or not. For that purpose,
> the exact list of credits is irrelevant.
That was just an example to show that unless we go through a precise and
thorough audit of all the packages we offer, the LICENSE variable is
_informational_ at best.
Having tools to manipulate those variables is very misleading since
users will (rightfully) assume that we've done our homework and that
upstream did too.
I don't intend to stop anyone from creating new tools, but I just want
us all to realize the limits of what is being done here.
Cheers,
Rémi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-04 14:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-08-31 22:12 [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Add operator + for licenses (EAPI-4 ?) Mounir Lamouri
2009-08-31 22:30 ` Rémi Cardona
2009-09-03 20:50 ` Mounir Lamouri
2009-09-01 2:21 ` Sebastian Pipping
2009-09-01 5:54 ` [gentoo-dev] " Duncan
2009-09-03 21:10 ` Mounir Lamouri
2009-09-03 21:15 ` Rémi Cardona
2009-09-03 21:27 ` Mounir Lamouri
2009-09-04 4:53 ` Duncan
2009-09-04 15:01 ` Rémi Cardona
2009-09-04 18:52 ` David Leverton
2009-09-04 20:04 ` Rémi Cardona [this message]
2009-09-04 20:08 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2009-09-05 14:03 ` Maciej Mrozowski
2009-09-05 15:02 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2009-09-06 0:34 ` Thomas Anderson
2009-09-06 6:31 ` Rémi Cardona
2009-09-03 21:08 ` [gentoo-dev] " Mounir Lamouri
2009-09-04 21:11 ` Sebastian Pipping
2009-09-05 1:06 ` Zac Medico
2009-09-05 8:40 ` [gentoo-dev] " Duncan
2009-09-05 9:28 ` [gentoo-dev] " Ulrich Mueller
2009-09-05 10:59 ` Zac Medico
2009-09-05 17:21 ` Mounir Lamouri
2009-09-05 18:41 ` Ulrich Mueller
2009-09-06 0:14 ` Sebastian Pipping
2009-09-05 21:37 ` Zac Medico
2009-10-01 2:01 ` Sebastian Pipping
2009-10-01 13:09 ` volkmar
2009-09-04 15:47 ` Jeremy Olexa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4AA172DE.80104@gentoo.org \
--to=remi@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox