public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Rémi Cardona" <remi@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev]  Re: [RFC] Add operator + for licenses (EAPI-4 ?)
Date: Fri, 04 Sep 2009 22:04:46 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4AA172DE.80104@gentoo.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200909041952.12314.levertond@googlemail.com>

Le 04/09/2009 20:52, David Leverton a écrit :
> Is that really a problem?

To me, it's not. :)

>  I admit to not being around for the original design
> decisions, but I would assume that the purpose of having LICENSE in ebuilds
> is to tell users what licence the package is under (whether or not it's
> accurate is a different matter), and the purpose of having the licences
> themselves in the tree is so that it's easy for users to look them up and
> decide whether they want to accept the conditions or not.  For that purpose,
> the exact list of credits is irrelevant.

That was just an example to show that unless we go through a precise and 
thorough audit of all the packages we offer, the LICENSE variable is 
_informational_ at best.

Having tools to manipulate those variables is very misleading since 
users will (rightfully) assume that we've done our homework and that 
upstream did too.

I don't intend to stop anyone from creating new tools, but I just want 
us all to realize the limits of what is being done here.

Cheers,

Rémi



  reply	other threads:[~2009-09-04 14:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-08-31 22:12 [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Add operator + for licenses (EAPI-4 ?) Mounir Lamouri
2009-08-31 22:30 ` Rémi Cardona
2009-09-03 20:50   ` Mounir Lamouri
2009-09-01  2:21 ` Sebastian Pipping
2009-09-01  5:54   ` [gentoo-dev] " Duncan
2009-09-03 21:10     ` Mounir Lamouri
2009-09-03 21:15       ` Rémi Cardona
2009-09-03 21:27         ` Mounir Lamouri
2009-09-04  4:53           ` Duncan
2009-09-04 15:01           ` Rémi Cardona
2009-09-04 18:52             ` David Leverton
2009-09-04 20:04               ` Rémi Cardona [this message]
2009-09-04 20:08                 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2009-09-05 14:03                   ` Maciej Mrozowski
2009-09-05 15:02                     ` Ciaran McCreesh
2009-09-06  0:34                     ` Thomas Anderson
2009-09-06  6:31                       ` Rémi Cardona
2009-09-03 21:08   ` [gentoo-dev] " Mounir Lamouri
2009-09-04 21:11     ` Sebastian Pipping
2009-09-05  1:06       ` Zac Medico
2009-09-05  8:40         ` [gentoo-dev] " Duncan
2009-09-05  9:28         ` [gentoo-dev] " Ulrich Mueller
2009-09-05 10:59           ` Zac Medico
2009-09-05 17:21         ` Mounir Lamouri
2009-09-05 18:41           ` Ulrich Mueller
2009-09-06  0:14             ` Sebastian Pipping
2009-09-05 21:37           ` Zac Medico
2009-10-01  2:01         ` Sebastian Pipping
2009-10-01 13:09           ` volkmar
2009-09-04 15:47 ` Jeremy Olexa

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4AA172DE.80104@gentoo.org \
    --to=remi@gentoo.org \
    --cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox