From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MjEqH-0006xB-Lv for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 03 Sep 2009 16:07:21 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E9A0AE0895; Thu, 3 Sep 2009 21:15:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp2-g21.free.fr (smtp2-g21.free.fr [212.27.42.2]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6806E0895 for ; Thu, 3 Sep 2009 21:15:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp2-g21.free.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp2-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17E244B0139 for ; Thu, 3 Sep 2009 23:15:35 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.0.13] (bne75-10-88-178-16-229.fbx.proxad.net [88.178.16.229]) by smtp2-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 312C64B0112 for ; Thu, 3 Sep 2009 23:15:33 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4AA031DE.5050702@gentoo.org> Date: Thu, 03 Sep 2009 23:15:10 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?UsOpbWkgQ2FyZG9uYQ==?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; fr; rv:1.9.1.1) Gecko/20090715 Thunderbird/3.0b3 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Add operator + for licenses (EAPI-4 ?) References: <4A9C4AD6.9080505@gentoo.org> <4A9C853D.8050003@hartwork.org> <4AA030C0.5010103@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <4AA030C0.5010103@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: 668c6d62-3a1d-4286-8835-34c561ee62bc X-Archives-Hash: f57cad862aa99e52432dd16c5f5df6ca Le 03/09/2009 23:10, Mounir Lamouri a =C3=A9crit : > Duncan wrote: >> Sebastian Pipping posted on Tue, 01 Sep 2009 04:21:49 +0200 as excerpt= ed: >> >> >>> However I do notice that "GPL-2+" could make things easier. Why not >>> introduce a license group for it like @GPL-2+ or so, instead? That wo= uld >>> be transparent and use existing means. >>> >> >> I've always thought Gentoo needed "plus" versions of the versioned >> licenses, anyway. GPL-2, GPL-2+, GPL-3, and GPL-3+, should all be >> different licenses, because really, they are. >> > AFAIK, GPL-2 and GPL-2+ are not different, may you tell me more about t= hat ? GPL-2+ means "GPL-2 GPL-3 GPL-4 ..." Not quite the same thing as just "GPL-2" R=C3=A9mi