From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-37467-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1MetpG-00033U-Vv
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 22 Aug 2009 16:52:23 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6885BE03A5;
	Sat, 22 Aug 2009 16:52:21 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtprelay09.ispgateway.de (smtprelay09.ispgateway.de [80.67.31.32])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39721E03A5
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 22 Aug 2009 16:52:21 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [85.179.1.85] (helo=[192.168.0.3])
	by smtprelay09.ispgateway.de with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256)
	(Exim 4.68)
	(envelope-from <webmaster@hartwork.org>)
	id 1MetrN-0006uR-QE
	for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Sat, 22 Aug 2009 18:54:34 +0200
Message-ID: <4A902243.80706@hartwork.org>
Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2009 18:52:19 +0200
From: Sebastian Pipping <webmaster@hartwork.org>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (X11/20090820)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev]  Re: Diff between Funtoo and Gentoo as an overlay
References: <4A8AE178.3060007@hartwork.org> <4A8F5A4E.80700@hartwork.org> <h6nmu9$v9i$1@ger.gmane.org> <h6nn5q$v9i$2@ger.gmane.org> <4A8F68A5.8020706@gentoo.org> <h6od2a$80e$1@ger.gmane.org> <4A8FF24D.8040309@gentoo.org> <h6ov7m$hvl$1@ger.gmane.org>
In-Reply-To: <h6ov7m$hvl$1@ger.gmane.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Df-Sender: 874396
X-Archives-Salt: 6a8e3414-aab6-4376-abd3-e29c3f0b92ad
X-Archives-Hash: 4c3d5ed2efb9caab8d36227384ec1260

Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> And I was under the impression that pure-funtoo
> falls under this category: providing packages that don't exist in portage.

If you want to you can adjust  funtoo-ripper  to do just that on your
local machine.  All you have to do is adjust the

  EbuildTree._minus

function:
http://git.goodpoint.de/?p=funtoo-ripper.git;a=blob;f=funtoo-ripper

Let me know if you have trouble with setting it up or if you have
patches for me.



Sebastian