From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Mes1C-0006kd-Ky for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 22 Aug 2009 14:56:34 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 94889E03B6; Sat, 22 Aug 2009 14:56:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mta-w3.tc.umn.edu (mta-w3.tc.umn.edu [134.84.119.32]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A0B8E03B6 for ; Sat, 22 Aug 2009 14:56:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.110] (c-71-63-157-77.hsd1.mn.comcast.net [71.63.157.77]) by mta-w3.tc.umn.edu (UMN smtpd) with ESMTP for ; Sat, 22 Aug 2009 09:56:33 -0500 (CDT) X-Umn-Remote-Mta: [N] c-71-63-157-77.hsd1.mn.comcast.net [71.63.157.77] #+TS+AU+HN Message-ID: <4A900720.3020905@gentoo.org> Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2009 09:56:32 -0500 From: Jeremy Olexa User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (X11/20090709) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Diff between Funtoo and Gentoo as an overlay References: <4A8AE178.3060007@hartwork.org> <4A8F5A4E.80700@hartwork.org> <4A8F6D16.90500@hartwork.org> In-Reply-To: <4A8F6D16.90500@hartwork.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 201530c5-ac5a-4561-be23-c579a3dddd44 X-Archives-Hash: 43180c4a6b7b7ff682c7b7309bdcef6f Sebastian Pipping wrote: > Nikos Chantziaras wrote: >> Uhm, I just discovered that there are conflicts with portage too. That >> is not good. After I added pure-funtoo, it messed up my emerge -u world >> (stuff like wanting to upgrade to sys-apps/baselayout-2.1.5). > > Hopefully fixed > http://git.goodpoint.de/?p=pure-funtoo.git;a=commitdiff;h=341663321f0cf876390fff5967105e403ed3fcbc See, the problem with this is when Gentoo itself gets a baselayout-2.1.x, then it is masked for them if they have the pure-funtoo overlay. IOW, people will complain one way, and then they will complain the other way. IMO, it is "busy work" for the overlay owner and should be left to the user to "know what they are doing" because all overlays are experimental. 2 cents, -Jeremy