From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-37455-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1Merpq-0004d6-NB
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 22 Aug 2009 14:44:50 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6E7E0E03D3;
	Sat, 22 Aug 2009 14:44:49 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mta-w3.tc.umn.edu (mta-w3.tc.umn.edu [134.84.119.32])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56F64E03D3
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 22 Aug 2009 14:44:49 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [192.168.1.110] (c-71-63-157-77.hsd1.mn.comcast.net [71.63.157.77])
	by mta-w3.tc.umn.edu (UMN smtpd) with ESMTP
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 22 Aug 2009 09:44:49 -0500 (CDT)
X-Umn-Remote-Mta: [N] c-71-63-157-77.hsd1.mn.comcast.net [71.63.157.77] #+TS+AU+HN
Message-ID: <4A90045F.6020002@gentoo.org>
Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2009 09:44:47 -0500
From: Jeremy Olexa <darkside@gentoo.org>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (X11/20090709)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev]  Re: Diff between Funtoo and Gentoo as an overlay
References: <4A8AE178.3060007@hartwork.org> <4A8F5A4E.80700@hartwork.org> <h6nmu9$v9i$1@ger.gmane.org> <h6nn5q$v9i$2@ger.gmane.org> <4A8F68A5.8020706@gentoo.org> <h6od2a$80e$1@ger.gmane.org> <4A8FF24D.8040309@gentoo.org> <h6ov7m$hvl$1@ger.gmane.org>
In-Reply-To: <h6ov7m$hvl$1@ger.gmane.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Archives-Salt: aa3e87ad-f0d8-4ef2-b4d1-df0047891094
X-Archives-Hash: 6d3661e13d54b2f04b6269c105b278df

Nikos Chantziaras wrote:

> Of course that's my personal opinion.  I don't use 
> "developer/experimental" overlays, I only use those who provide some 
> extra packages I want.  And I was under the impression that pure-funtoo 
> falls under this category: providing packages that don't exist in portage.

By the nature of Funtoo being a entirely different distribution, that is 
a wrong assumption. It is unreasonable to expect the pure-funtoo overlay 
owner to mask everything that is an upgrade but not in portage yet. I 
would recommend that you remove the pure-funtoo overlay, because your 
expectations don't match reality.

-Jeremy