Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Diff between Funtoo and Gentoo as an overlay

[Thomas Sachau <tommy@gentoo.org>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 952 bytes --]

Sebastian Pipping schrieb:
> Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
>> There seems to be a bit of (minimal) duplication between pure-funtoo and
>> sunrise:
>>
>>   app-office/thinking-rock-bin
>>   dev-tex/mimetex
>>   x11-drivers/xf86-video-nouveau
>>
>> And since sunrise is the most popular overlay, it might be a good idea
>> to also omit packages found in sunrise.
> 
> Sunrise ebuilds are subtracted already.
> 
> The reason app-office/thinking-rock-bin ends up in pure-funtoo is that
> newer version of existing ebuilds are also taking into account:
> 
>   Sunrise:  2.0_pre2-r2
>   Funtoo:   2.0.1
> 
> That's why app-office/thinking-rock-bin-2.0.1 is in pure-funtoo.
> 
> 
> 
> Sebastian
> 
> 

I suggest that you (or the person, who added those ebuilds to funtoo) join the Sunrise project and
update the ebuild in the sunrise overlay instead of adding it to another tree. ;-)

-- 
Thomas Sachau

Gentoo Linux Developer


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 316 bytes --]