* [gentoo-dev] QA last rites for x11-misc/xac
@ 2009-08-09 16:25 Diego E. Pettenò
2009-08-10 1:06 ` Joseph Jezak
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Diego E. Pettenò @ 2009-08-09 16:25 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev-announce; +Cc: gentoo-dev
# Diego E. Pettenò <flameeyes@gentoo.org> (09 Aug 2009)
# on behalf of QA team
#
# Fails to build with recent linux-headers (bug #241484,
# October 2008).
#
# Removal on 2009-10-08
x11-misc/xac
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] QA last rites for x11-misc/xac
2009-08-09 16:25 [gentoo-dev] QA last rites for x11-misc/xac Diego E. Pettenò
@ 2009-08-10 1:06 ` Joseph Jezak
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Joseph Jezak @ 2009-08-10 1:06 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
Diego E. Pettenò wrote:
> # Diego E. Pettenò <flameeyes@gentoo.org> (09 Aug 2009)
> # on behalf of QA team
> #
> # Fails to build with recent linux-headers (bug #241484,
> # October 2008).
> #
> # Removal on 2009-10-08
> x11-misc/xac
>
It builds fine on PowerPC and is still useful there. I never really got
any feedback from x86/amd64 users about xac and its probably not as
useful there now with the newer autoconfiguring X.
I'd like to keep it in the tree, but perhaps remove the keywords for
x86/amd64? Or if people are interested in still keeping it working
there, let me know?
-Joe
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-08-10 1:10 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-08-09 16:25 [gentoo-dev] QA last rites for x11-misc/xac Diego E. Pettenò
2009-08-10 1:06 ` Joseph Jezak
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox