From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MZ2mr-0004WB-5t for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 06 Aug 2009 13:13:41 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BA19FE00AD; Thu, 6 Aug 2009 13:13:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mta-a3.tc.umn.edu (mta-a3.tc.umn.edu [134.84.119.232]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DB2CE00AD for ; Thu, 6 Aug 2009 13:13:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.110] (c-71-63-157-77.hsd1.mn.comcast.net [71.63.157.77]) by mta-a3.tc.umn.edu (UMN smtpd) with ESMTP for ; Thu, 6 Aug 2009 08:13:38 -0500 (CDT) X-Umn-Remote-Mta: [N] c-71-63-157-77.hsd1.mn.comcast.net [71.63.157.77] #+TS+AU+HN Message-ID: <4A7AD700.9010906@gentoo.org> Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2009 08:13:36 -0500 From: Jeremy Olexa User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (X11/20090508) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] New 10.0 profiles are in repository References: <4A7A921C.2050907@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <4A7A921C.2050907@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: b70cd041-d145-4870-b89c-d7302c5d7eda X-Archives-Hash: aeaa78e5647b11506b4913f97796b518 Samuli Suominen wrote: > As subject says, > > default/linux/*/10.0 > default/hardened/linux/*/10.0 > > Profiles are up, the 10.0 releng / 10th anniversary ones. > > All new development is to be done with these. > > For users of 2008.0 this doesn't mean much as they are cloned ones. > > New LiveCD's will be based on 10.0. > > For arch's & hardened: You should deprecated 2008.0 in, let's say, when > year changes and point users to switching to 10.0 ones (feel free to do > this sooner). Handbooks needs to be also updated. > > Thanks, Samuli > Hi Samuli, Given the multi-inheritance nature of profiles, it is not obvious what changed to me. So, what is new with 10.0 profiles or are they a "cosmetic" naming change? Thanks, Jeremy