From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MOAfE-0005fk-9n for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 07 Jul 2009 13:24:52 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E155DE03CA; Tue, 7 Jul 2009 13:24:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.trelane.net (mail.trelane.net [66.93.203.104]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C36F7E03CA for ; Tue, 7 Jul 2009 13:24:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail.trelane.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8E5618663C; Tue, 7 Jul 2009 09:24:48 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at trelane.net Received: from mail.trelane.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (master.trelane.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qcQqw-c+FqCa; Tue, 7 Jul 2009 09:24:46 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail.trelane.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F7681866ED; Tue, 7 Jul 2009 09:24:46 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [172.16.1.99] (router.trelane.net [66.93.203.152]) by mail.trelane.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C315018663C; Tue, 7 Jul 2009 09:24:45 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4A534C9D.30204@trelane.net> Date: Tue, 07 Jul 2009 09:24:45 -0400 From: Andrew D Kirch User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (X11/20090510) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ferringb@gmail.com, gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Preparing profiles for EAPI 3 IUSE strictness References: <20090707000111.473a10bd@snowmobile> <4A52E641.9080403@trelane.net> <20090707062714.GD6719@hrair> In-Reply-To: <20090707062714.GD6719@hrair> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: a19196b5-4b29-4774-b56d-fe2ae9800d31 X-Archives-Hash: ff98cc6ecb9054a2938d1379d2c78d1f Yeah, that was definately a misunderstanding of something bonzaikitten said. Mea culpa. Andrew Brian Harring wrote: > On Tue, Jul 07, 2009 at 02:08:01AM -0400, Andrew D Kirch wrote: > >> Ciaran, >> >> I've talked with the pkgcore people and they don't use the EAPI's (or >> PMS) in the first place. >> > > No clue who you talked to, but they weren't speaking for pkgcore- I > speak for pkgcore pretty much solely. Pkgcore utilizes EAPIs- hell I > added the original support to portage. Not sure what info you got > fed, but it was a bit off. > > >> I think that ending this discussion here and moving it over to a forum >> more appropriate to package manager development would reduce the >> temperature around your proposals and get them implemented (as Zac seems >> willing to do so). >> > > I don't particularly care one way or another (subscribed to both > MLs), just mostly correcting one large misstatement... > > ~harring >