From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1ML7rI-00030o-0I for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 29 Jun 2009 03:48:44 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6934AE05E8; Mon, 29 Jun 2009 03:48:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.trelane.net (mail.trelane.net [66.93.203.104]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 408F3E05E8 for ; Mon, 29 Jun 2009 03:48:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail.trelane.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 871881866E5 for ; Sun, 28 Jun 2009 23:48:41 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at trelane.net Received: from mail.trelane.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (master.trelane.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Q8tv04ihftON for ; Sun, 28 Jun 2009 23:48:38 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail.trelane.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F38C1866E9 for ; Sun, 28 Jun 2009 23:48:37 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [172.16.1.99] (router.trelane.net [66.93.203.152]) by mail.trelane.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CFDD1866E5 for ; Sun, 28 Jun 2009 23:48:35 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4A483992.5000906@trelane.net> Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2009 23:48:34 -0400 From: Andrew D Kirch User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (X11/20090510) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] 2009 Council Elections References: <200906252100.52295.wk@mailstation.de> <8b4c83ad0906251250k474d15f6vdef8f1afed8d2baf@mail.gmail.com> <20090625205746.287e9bc7@snowcone> <8b4c83ad0906252334n512a5f00ra2f5af98c0303ba0@mail.gmail.com> <20090626125547.00618821@snowmobile> In-Reply-To: <20090626125547.00618821@snowmobile> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 1657f443-f09e-45d1-b3b7-36dc96f1fda6 X-Archives-Hash: 0113722854482f652a787eb5244ec157 Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Fri, 26 Jun 2009 12:04:14 +0530 > Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: > > The spirit and the letter of the rules are clear: the electorate can > vote in whoever they want, and council members can appoint whoever they > want so long as no-one has multiple votes at any given meaning. GLEP 39 > is very clear and explicit about all the restrictions. > > No one, and I mean no one (other than dev-zero apparently) wants you voting on anything. If your ties to GLEP's 54/55 are not sufficient to cause you a conflict of interests then your ties to exherbo do. I would not _ever_ be able to accept a proxy offer in good conscience because of my work on Funtoo. Your lack of integrity, followed by your bellicose attitude simply astounds me. dev-zero should not have offered, and I think there needs to be a discussion as to why he did. Ciaran, you should not EVER have accepted it. The council was right in throwing it out. This isn't hard, we don't need a whole new set of rules and amendments to glep 39, we need developers and participants with common sense. Your behavior disgusts me (though I can point out that this is a continuous problem rather than simply contained in this one incident.) Andrew D Kirch Funtoo