From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MBnxq-0000Nb-4N for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 03 Jun 2009 10:44:58 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9EE93E03C9; Wed, 3 Jun 2009 10:44:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from castor.sshunet.nl (castor.sshunet.nl [145.97.192.41]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7341EE03C9 for ; Wed, 3 Jun 2009 10:44:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by castor.sshunet.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B6B857C007 for ; Wed, 3 Jun 2009 12:44:55 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at castor.sshunet.nl Received: from castor.sshunet.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (castor.sshunet.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FDmSOie+nqfH for ; Wed, 3 Jun 2009 12:44:55 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [145.97.222.205] (205pc222.sshunet.nl [145.97.222.205]) by castor.sshunet.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Wed, 3 Jun 2009 12:44:55 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4A2653C6.70106@gentoo.org> Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2009 12:43:18 +0200 From: "Marijn Schouten (hkBst)" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (X11/20090320) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: How not to discuss References: <20090527210642.6b7b0f21@snowcone> <20090530145613.37514ceb@halo.dirtyepic.sk.ca> <4A21E40A.60500@gentoo.org> <200905311126.00274.bangert@gentoo.org> <1565621.WYyjxmS50y@news.friendly-coders.info> <4A254773.6080908@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <4A254773.6080908@gentoo.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 21212137-cf33-41d0-b88f-f377d54ff034 X-Archives-Hash: ed674d4a6fe3521b278653c23e97f385 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Richard Freeman wrote: > Steven J Long wrote: >> Getting into a nonsensical debate about PN being metadata seems to be >> the level of the argument, so forgive me for not being very impressed. >> (It's externally derived and in fact the whole point of the product; >> unless someone is proposing losing PN and PV from filename, can we >> *please* dismiss that argument as the irrelevance which it is?) >> > > Without actually intending to open a new debate on that issue , > I'm actually a fan of NOT obtaining PN and PV from the filename. I've > seen an approach like this used in various systems and I happen to like it: In which systems did you see this approach? Marijn - -- If you cannot read my mind, then listen to what I say. Marijn Schouten (hkBst), Gentoo Lisp project, Gentoo ML , #gentoo-{lisp,ml} on FreeNode -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkomU8YACgkQp/VmCx0OL2ym0QCfcbruFkqtUIBhdwhKIjaP9qol Qi8An0TdECGv14pgMTmjdDhllvGylM7y =1iV1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----