From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1M9lUN-0008Ay-36 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 28 May 2009 19:42:07 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A9B62E04E5; Thu, 28 May 2009 19:42:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84769E04E5 for ; Thu, 28 May 2009 19:42:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.116] (ip72-220-190-13.sd.sd.cox.net [72.220.190.13]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9AFB664C4 for ; Thu, 28 May 2009 19:42:04 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4A1EE90A.5010007@gentoo.org> Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 12:42:02 -0700 From: Josh Saddler User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (X11/20090330) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Council Reminder for May 28 References: <1243489596.10450.24.camel@localhost> <200905282030.44496.patrick@gentoo.org> <20090528194845.30a7c9ad@snowcone> <200905282119.35666.patrick@gentoo.org> <20090528202643.0d763768@snowcone> In-Reply-To: <20090528202643.0d763768@snowcone> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigFB8CF9A81D480CBEE48C2EB6" X-Archives-Salt: bcab0552-b147-4288-b62a-f8fde5b59aaf X-Archives-Hash: bc8a076b8add67096a3a6cde7778470f This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigFB8CF9A81D480CBEE48C2EB6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Ladies, please. Put the tampons back in and take a Midol. * * * GLEP55 has not effectively shown that there *is* a problem, otherwise we wouldn't have had months of discussion on that topic. Nor has it shown that its proposed solution *is* the best solution, otherwise we would have adopted it months ago instead of dicking about on the mailing lists with clever doublespeak dodging, like an e-penis jousting tournament. There are serious issues related to the wording of the GLEP and its proposed solution, as the majority of list replies have stated for the last few months. Pretending they don't exist without listing each and every single one (as I'm sure the proponents of the GLEP would like) is just ostriching. Telling someone "It's my way or nothing, because nothing else is valid and nothing else will work and no one has a better idea than me" is stonewalling, and it is entirely counterproductive. Perhaps that tactic works in *some* pet distributions and package managers, but it does not work for Gentoo. --------------enigFB8CF9A81D480CBEE48C2EB6 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkoe6QwACgkQxPWMzpKk6kMwXACfTbaYXD9Q+beW1+QPzy2uDVbF QCQAn10psbRRpxxA4ko2tGMIQ/hBU3MS =BaoC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigFB8CF9A81D480CBEE48C2EB6--