From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1M96Z7-0006PI-Lk for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 27 May 2009 00:00:17 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4A185E0539; Wed, 27 May 2009 00:00:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F84DE0539 for ; Wed, 27 May 2009 00:00:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.116] (ip72-220-190-13.sd.sd.cox.net [72.220.190.13]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFDC765764 for ; Wed, 27 May 2009 00:00:14 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4A1C828B.8090305@gentoo.org> Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 17:00:11 -0700 From: Josh Saddler User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (X11/20090330) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] New app-eselect category? References: <18971.38030.314626.857360@a1ihome1.kph.uni-mainz.de> <20090526151710.GC11826@gentoo.org> <4A1C0B45.1000805@allenjb.me.uk> In-Reply-To: <4A1C0B45.1000805@allenjb.me.uk> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig40FBF68D08E5A87772EDC607" X-Archives-Salt: 3961b6b1-cd5f-45c2-8918-6aa8e341da7c X-Archives-Hash: af25c9169ed474ed23ff1b64b340974a This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig40FBF68D08E5A87772EDC607 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable AllenJB wrote: > I'd favor tags over increasing the category > levels, tho I'm not convinced either is necessary at the current time > (tho tags might make searching easier, in some ways). Heck yes! Tags are a good idea. The idea's been raised on -dev a few times. I suppose they're not (yet) essential, but from a user point of view, if the tools supported searching for tags buried in metadata.xml, it would make life much, much nicer. And if wishes were horses . . . maybe one day we'd all ride. Or at least argue about what shade of pink to paint the ponies. :p --------------enig40FBF68D08E5A87772EDC607 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkocgo0ACgkQxPWMzpKk6kOilgCgjHUxjHu/4mzrhHROmxEpoMf/ MkMAnAxCEVCKNvdvzsfmen/+D7TqIuli =p5Pz -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig40FBF68D08E5A87772EDC607--