From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1M8znD-00008l-SF for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 26 May 2009 16:46:24 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5899FE03D8; Tue, 26 May 2009 16:46:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from swip.net (mailfe14.tele2.it [212.247.155.173]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0561CE03D8 for ; Tue, 26 May 2009 16:46:21 +0000 (UTC) X-Cloudmark-Score: 0.000000 [] X-Cloudmark-Analysis: v=1.0 c=1 a=jEKG-2XBmX4A:10 a=5xn_3_kegt4A:10 a=xe8BsctaAAAA:8 a=ksCi13HQmTJ2LS0OBsUA:9 a=CrpTlS_1S3EZOt7jR5x55cvdtwkA:4 Received: from [93.149.166.249] (account cxu-8de-gew@tele2.it HELO [192.168.1.29]) by mailfe14.swip.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.13) with ESMTPA id 505130141 for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Tue, 26 May 2009 18:46:20 +0200 Received-SPF: neutral receiver=mailfe14.swip.net; client-ip=93.149.166.249; envelope-from=mescalinum@gentoo.org Message-ID: <4A1C1CDA.2050507@gentoo.org> Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 18:46:18 +0200 From: Federico Ferri User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (X11/20090503) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] New app-eselect category? References: <18971.38030.314626.857360@a1ihome1.kph.uni-mainz.de> <20090526151710.GC11826@gentoo.org> <4A1C0B45.1000805@allenjb.me.uk> In-Reply-To: <4A1C0B45.1000805@allenjb.me.uk> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7 OpenPGP: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 93e5ae90-6d4f-4706-8261-504336c89c5d X-Archives-Hash: 520d66b976b5797f893430a69c9d6f55 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 AllenJB wrote: > Fabian Groffen wrote: >> On 26-05-2009 09:04:46 +0200, Ulrich Mueller wrote: >>> As of today, app-admin contains 179 packages. We could move the >>> 27 eselect-* packages to a new app-eselect category (eselect >>> itself would stay in app-admin). >>> >>> Opinions? >> >> I hate package moves, so is it really *really* necessary? >> >> > I have to agree. app-admin is hardly among the largest categories. > Perhaps we should consider splitting up the 400 odd packages in > kde-base (kde-graphics, kde-admin, kde-games, etc) =P > > As for app-admin-eselect, I'd favor tags over increasing the > category levels, tho I'm not the three-levels-category was an example. the realistic approach I proposed is splitting app-admin in many two-level categories: + admin-eselect + admin-sysconf + admin-www + admin-apache ... as it usually has been done in such cases. - -- Federico Ferri (mescalinum) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkocHNoACgkQV/B5axfzrPsCzgCeJZknEWRV1o2SjPpPc9HJ0k1u bUoAnRygFK/mRPfAguutyUmZWssnPyXh =hZFu -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----