From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1M6jxY-0005I8-BQ for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 20 May 2009 11:27:44 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C03CCE035D; Wed, 20 May 2009 11:27:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qy0-f115.google.com (mail-qy0-f115.google.com [209.85.221.115]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99720E035D for ; Wed, 20 May 2009 11:27:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qyk13 with SMTP id 13so574178qyk.32 for ; Wed, 20 May 2009 04:27:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=/KdPWwd1AB65qP6qMk70WpNuY7acxCpfXg+/MC+ITYY=; b=cM4vN25pAWjgEThrNxl3CheFzNAiNaMnP8wMOtP8AZqQ+aO38DDj4FNaQ1zPe5vUqA uJR2Axg9Eo01vbgQ1stHTtAuNXHLseXEma/pXfySxHsOFKZxNoDbY8F9dXvQ6LvAhmlw xEpk0Opctq+6LZGoe/od5Y+WsAW9rNqFxbwOI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=epCrzl5OgvLzR6QiPuvNsRMCWSq/1nGiHhIXrg4myt/B5tIl00lvdnhZ13XqtAuak3 Q+VpQ1ht6tfu7Zn33yQiUazO4dO6nu5tkmAIyUusD8gKUCnAwJXsy/socLBRPEKm6Mzw UweVFd4KHXZN2cPuCXahaId6QbQFSYKauuTA8= Received: by 10.224.54.142 with SMTP id q14mr1099660qag.217.1242818860633; Wed, 20 May 2009 04:27:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?64.89.164.29? (r164h29.dixie-net.com [64.89.164.29]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 26sm1351916qwa.48.2009.05.20.04.27.22 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 20 May 2009 04:27:39 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4A13E8ED.8010207@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 06:26:37 -0500 From: Dale User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.21) Gecko/20090519 SeaMonkey/1.1.16 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Gentoo Support Everywhere References: <1242767909.3964.0@NeddySeagoon> <4A133498.7010102@gmail.com> <7b346cb1c1b8fc04a1f3db8b87fd80da.squirrel@jesgue.homelinux.org> <4A137A01.7010800@gmail.com> <267e8dd7314b98e3d9e5dbf406e4da5c.squirrel@jesgue.homelinux.org> In-Reply-To: <267e8dd7314b98e3d9e5dbf406e4da5c.squirrel@jesgue.homelinux.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: 4154bf05-23a2-4bba-bdfe-a3df2b1ba2a0 X-Archives-Hash: 4dbd3b242e0d487d994dbe02c9f3d0cc Jes=FAs Guerrero wrote: > On Wed, May 20, 2009 05:33, Dale wrote: > =20 >> Jes=FAs Guerrero wrote: >> >> I don't see how doing double the work will benefit anyone. Its a lot >> easier to have one forum than it is to have two forums. I just think = the >> Gentoo folks would be better to concentrate on what we have than to >> be spreading more work around for the same people. Its not like they = don't >> have enough work already. >> >> =20 > > > What I don't get about your argument is how to you think that > banning the rest of the world from our minds and cutting > all the relations with the rest of forums in the Earth is > going to be any more beneficial for Gentoo that working in > collaboration with them. > > It's like a cat who hides his head and thinks that the rest > of the world has disappeared. Which isn't true. There are lots > of gentoo related forums around and they will be there and > people will use them no matter how bad you think that is, Dale. > > Some links that desultory kindly handed me are these: > > http://www.linuxforums.org/forum/gentoo-linux-help/ > http://www.gentoo-quebec.org/forum/ > https://www.hamiltonshells.ca/phpBB/viewforum.php?f=3D8 > http://www.gentoo.fr/forum/index.php > http://www.gentooforum.de/ > http://www.gentoo-forum.nl/ > > But there are lots more. I am already handing my time there, > and neither you nor Gentoo as a project can tell my what to do > with my time. So I will continue giving support there, even if > you or anyone else think that I am harming Gentoo by not > concentrating my effort into a single point. I can do it on > behalf of Gentoo and have an easier time, or I can do it > on behalf of me and have a harder time. But I'll do it > nonetheless. As said, this is not open for discussion, this > is the reality, at least until the G foundation can control > my mind. Period. :) > > So I really don't understand your argument. I will not be > "harming" Gentoo anymore that I've benn "harming" it for a > long long time now. :D > > No one has to join or worry about this at all if s/he doesn't > care so I have no idea what extra work are you talking about. > No one has to worry about me or the gse project either. > > Regards and a nice day! :) > =20 But does Gentoo support those forums? My point is, the people here, devs in particular, have enough to do already. Why add one more thing for them to deal with? Dale :-) :-)=20