From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1M6XwW-0003Az-Fz for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 19 May 2009 22:37:52 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 58A44E0453; Tue, 19 May 2009 22:37:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from qw-out-1920.google.com (qw-out-1920.google.com [74.125.92.144]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E464E0453 for ; Tue, 19 May 2009 22:37:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qw-out-1920.google.com with SMTP id 9so66905qwj.10 for ; Tue, 19 May 2009 15:37:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=2Yb0H6M7Nw5E/3Zka6pN1JWhiTr6cMK9g0FqVt1rxRs=; b=Lp8pIooe3fPtD/98kAJUtRzv1Dlo/4THsXaHTN5WSGUS7QzjTwNAiD//YwC8gFk8lh at7BnHOHtwpfQzoVmYhFKgecDdcDDDxbz+k75ErB65JPsa9fC77Wj/f2JYuZ1XAodZup quJ3BG7ShTUmbPudaW/0adHn3jF4JGpKiADR4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=CzNS0W2J9FZHPICBVyx4Lb8WSy/xhvq2HkmognSReOKLpaMug0xEVCHMenqEZtndAH I/DK0qfhvYOPKo8BkFIdFzxV5KUYRXnqavbcdcgSv5DVrwey3XoV1XQADQPF1JPHCho3 uSnE9wx10oQHX/4gEF6s/Kh3Fk6pj7rS08N6s= Received: by 10.224.54.65 with SMTP id p1mr681304qag.99.1242772670969; Tue, 19 May 2009 15:37:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?64.89.164.184? (r164h184.dixie-net.com [64.89.164.184]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 7sm610406qwb.16.2009.05.19.15.37.42 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 19 May 2009 15:37:50 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4A133498.7010102@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 17:37:12 -0500 From: Dale User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.21) Gecko/20090519 SeaMonkey/1.1.16 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Gentoo Support Everywhere References: <1242767909.3964.0@NeddySeagoon> In-Reply-To: <1242767909.3964.0@NeddySeagoon> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 51e7425b-ae85-4548-a251-f96594578421 X-Archives-Hash: ae7a77ef2fc63697939fadbd11121b4e Roy Bamford wrote: > On 2009.05.19 20:52, Dale wrote: > [snip] > > From my understanding, LQ doesn't have a Gentoo subforum because > > Gentoo > > already has its own forum. Why should Gentoo have two forums? I > > must > > also say the the Gentoo forum is more than adequate for help. > > > Also, the link to your thread does not exist. I get "The topic or > > post > > you requested does not exist". > > > Dale > > > :-) :-) > > > > Dale, > > LQ does not have a Gentoo subforum because Gentoo does not yet support > such a subforum. > > I'm sure that the Gentoo Forums are more than adequate for the users > that find their way to them but that LQ gets Gentoo related questions > shows that there is a demand for support there, even if its to post a > link to Gentoo documentaion or posts on the Gentoo Forums. > > The Gentoo subforum on LQ would help to collect the posts in one place. > That would be the point. Gentoo has its own forum so why have two forums? What would be the point in having two places to go look for answers? Better yet, why would Gentoo support both forums? I'm a member at LQ tho I haven't been there in a long while. I just don't see why there has to be two forums when the one forum we have is more than enough. If someone can't find the Gentoo forums, I'm not sure they can find the chair and keyboard either. lol Dale :-) :-)