From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1M5fEN-0004Xs-AT for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 17 May 2009 12:12:39 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9BE82E049F; Sun, 17 May 2009 12:12:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp03.tky.fi (smtp03.tky.fi [82.130.63.73]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4FDEAE049F for ; Sun, 17 May 2009 12:12:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [82.130.46.217] ([82.130.46.217]) by smtp03.tky.fi (SMSSMTP 4.1.9.35) with SMTP id M2009051715123618123 for ; Sun, 17 May 2009 15:12:36 +0300 Message-ID: <4A0FFF35.3020408@gentoo.org> Date: Sun, 17 May 2009 15:12:37 +0300 From: =?UTF-8?B?UGV0dGVyaSBSw6R0eQ==?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; fi; rv:1.8.1.21) Gecko/20090324 Thunderbird/2.0.0.21 Mnenhy/0.7.6.666 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Files owned by multiple slots References: <6EC3E6EE-F8BF-42F4-90F1-DEA00B628D09@delirium.ch> <1242215007.1403.2.camel@dhcp-16.lan.rep.sj> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7 OpenPGP: url=http://users.tkk.fi/~praty/public.asc Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigCDC567FEE7E179B65302D0EB" X-Archives-Salt: dd763027-bd97-4373-8144-561cef8735d0 X-Archives-Hash: 32a8038eea38bcf6f184a86a42ac71d1 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigCDC567FEE7E179B65302D0EB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sven wrote: > Gilles Dartiguelongue gentoo.org> writes: >>>> so this wrapper could be installed in a separate eselect sort of >>>> package ? >>> How exactly can this be done? If a gem creates five executables, woul= d =20 >>> this mean that this gem comes in six ebuilds? >> well given the next answer, it sounds like that's what I'm proposing. >> I release this might create a packaging overhead. >=20 > I'll check the docs to learn about how this could be done. >=20 > Yet meanwhile I'd love to get some feedback on my original proposition:= Is it > feasable and acceptable to expand Portage by the possibility to declare= a file > shared between slots and only delete it once the last slot is uninstall= ed? >=20 > Thanks for some feedback on this! =20 >=20 > -sven >=20 >=20 This can also be accomplish by a shared dependency package so is there a particular benefit for extending EAPI to support this? Regards, Petteri --------------enigCDC567FEE7E179B65302D0EB Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkoP/zUACgkQcxLzpIGCsLTT/ACbBN42y8ki8M92ldXACehtibc4 m6cAoJNonefj8QRih63JogkMjms6J5cu =zAyi -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigCDC567FEE7E179B65302D0EB--