From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LoPSP-0001MZ-VZ for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 21:55:50 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3617BE07F0; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 21:53:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from host171.http-media.de (213-239-241-171.clients.your-server.de [213.239.241.171]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 627D6E07F0 for ; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 21:53:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by host171.http-media.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44CE613EC095 for ; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 23:53:37 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.1.230] (f053231110.adsl.alicedsl.de [78.53.231.110]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by host171.http-media.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1ACFC13EC08F for ; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 23:53:37 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <49D13F60.2040909@necoro.eu> Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 23:53:36 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?UmVuw6kgJ05lY29ybycgTmV1bWFubg==?= User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (X11/20090323) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: bzr.eclass: The next level (this time with patch) References: <20090306085454.52f4263b@terra.solaris> <49B709E2.5090106@necoro.eu> <20090327014508.45d47afa@terra.solaris> In-Reply-To: <20090327014508.45d47afa@terra.solaris> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at host171.sitepush.net Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: e1e4cbd9-67ef-452d-a3eb-4239bf38b497 X-Archives-Hash: 655247129472b3c6f1d52c76df9da770 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Christian Faulhammer schrieb: > Hi, >=20 > Ren=C3=A9 'Necoro' Neumann : >> So I'd vote for switching back to using normal checkouts (or branches >> - they don't really differ in bzr for that matter). >=20 > My tests with Bazaar 1.13.1 show roughly the same time with and > without --lightweight. Although I am not sure what you mean by > export vs. fetch. fetch: bzr branch / bzr co export: bzr export And depending on the type of the repository, the export will take different times. And I see the export as quite important, as the number of exports is at least as high as the number of fetches. Regards, Necoro -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAknRP2AACgkQ4UOg/zhYFuBunwCfQG03AEruswY0UX39LTL6jmmt ZWsAn06PRrCHaGMzoIneRVPLwzzYxrb2 =3DC9GU -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----