From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LfxHL-0007oH-7O for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 07 Mar 2009 14:13:27 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2E3E5E02D8; Sat, 7 Mar 2009 14:13:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp03.tky.fi (smtp03.tky.fi [82.130.63.73]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CE5D0E02D8 for ; Sat, 7 Mar 2009 14:13:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [82.130.46.209] ([82.130.46.209]) by smtp03.tky.fi (SMSSMTP 4.1.9.35) with SMTP id M2009030716132415506 ; Sat, 07 Mar 2009 16:13:24 +0200 Message-ID: <49B28153.50503@gentoo.org> Date: Sat, 07 Mar 2009 16:14:43 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?UGV0dGVyaSBSw6R0eQ==?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; fi; rv:1.8.1.19) Gecko/20090111 Thunderbird/2.0.0.19 Mnenhy/0.7.6.666 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org CC: bugday@gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Suggestion for next bugday: Mass use deps migration References: <499EE087.1030802@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <499EE087.1030802@gentoo.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7 OpenPGP: url=http://users.tkk.fi/~praty/public.asc Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig41D64F8E8CD91A1EFE09455E" X-Archives-Salt: 9b2ce710-6525-4927-aab5-7c36c5c74521 X-Archives-Hash: 0f8decfe4bd77187c9ad3abcd4f00008 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig41D64F8E8CD91A1EFE09455E Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Petteri R=C3=A4ty wrote: > I suggest that we dedicate the next bugday in March to migrating as man= y > built_with_use calls to use dependencies as possible. Actively > maintained packages should have mostly been migrated by now and in > general it's better for the user experience to get rid of all those > built_with_use calls instead of waiting for the unmaintained/slacking > parts of the tree to get migrated. >=20 > Suggestions/objections? >=20 > Regards, > Petteri >=20 I will be doing a category or two I am involved with. If you want to join in the fun, come to #gentoo-bugs and claim a category or two. Regards, Petteri --------------enig41D64F8E8CD91A1EFE09455E Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkmygVYACgkQcxLzpIGCsLSf3ACfVRdkOoppcwLEC0qhUYdmQyN1 /dMAnAwYfyXuqL2FS5LGPijXJThKplZE =l5h9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig41D64F8E8CD91A1EFE09455E--