From: Mike Auty <ikelos@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Git eclass update
Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2009 11:30:23 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49AE664F.10905@gentoo.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200903032047.37936.scarabeus@gentoo.org>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Tomáš Chvátal wrote:
> I am throwing in full new eclass [1] and its diff [2].
Errr, maybe it's my eyes, but it looks as though the new eclass isn't
the same as the existing eclass with the diff applied (for instance,
git_src_prepare doesn't get called in the diff, but does in the new eclass).
Also, base_src_prepare doesn't get exported if EAPI != 2, so I'm not
sure what happens when it gets called from git_src_prepare (which can be
called when EAPI = 0|1). Has anyone actually tried this on a non-EAPI2
ebuild?
Lastly (and this happened in the old eclass, but I figured since it was
getting an update now would be a good time to fix it), because checking
out uses "--depth 1", it's possible for a checkout to fail (specifically
if EGIT_BRANCH/EGIT_TREE is set on first checkout) since the required
commitish may not exist in the shallow copy. The error messages thrown
out are along the lines of "not a tar file", but I believe the ebuild
continues, until it doesn't find the unpacked source. The possible
fixes would be to:
a) ask git to clone at a specific commitish (although I can see how to
do that in git clone --help)
b) see if there's a specific commit set, and then clone the whole tree
c) see if there's a specific commit set, and if so trap the error
message and offer a useful warning like "remove the repo and set
EGIT_FETCH_CMD='git clone --bare'"
Unfortunately a) and b) don't solve the problem of a specific commit
being set by a user after the initial clone's taken place (in which
case, if it's not in the clone there'll never be a way to get it from
that checked out copy).
Perhaps on an error during an update could clear out the git repository
from distfiles/git-src and try again without a --depth? Clones made
without a --depth entry that then fail would be an actual fail...
Mike 5:)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.10 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAkmuZk4ACgkQu7rWomwgFXoZ9wCbBh2BH7ERu+Ck/0W0IkLxHPU4
GW4An1DMBJ2rK+Hkb92U571QegW+VDhQ
=aB2B
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-03-04 11:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-03-03 19:47 [gentoo-dev] Git eclass update Tomáš Chvátal
2009-03-04 10:22 ` Rémi Cardona
2009-03-04 16:44 ` Tomáš Chvátal
2009-03-04 10:29 ` Rémi Cardona
2009-03-04 16:45 ` Tomáš Chvátal
2009-03-06 6:04 ` Donnie Berkholz
2009-03-04 11:30 ` Mike Auty [this message]
2009-03-04 16:45 ` Tomáš Chvátal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=49AE664F.10905@gentoo.org \
--to=ikelos@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox