From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LcQrU-0002TR-15 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 25 Feb 2009 21:00:12 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EDCE8E02B2; Wed, 25 Feb 2009 21:00:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C60F8E02B2 for ; Wed, 25 Feb 2009 21:00:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.0.3.98] (mail.boulder.swri.edu [65.241.78.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47FAC65001 for ; Wed, 25 Feb 2009 21:00:10 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <49A5B153.9020303@gentoo.org> Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 14:00:03 -0700 From: Joe Peterson User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (X11/20081107) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Collecting opinions about GLEP 55 and alternatives References: <49A472E3.1010204@gentoo.org> <18852.60124.933911.805465@a1ihome1.kph.uni-mainz.de> In-Reply-To: <18852.60124.933911.805465@a1ihome1.kph.uni-mainz.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: 9e950e64-630d-4bc2-83e2-efab3b1e017a X-Archives-Hash: 9438b4b9f023e7b89cc07e845e9b198e Ulrich Mueller wrote: >>>>>> On Wed, 25 Feb 2009, Petteri R=E4ty wrote: >=20 >> Let's try something new. I would like to get opinions from as many >> people as possible about GLEP 55 and alternatives listed here in order >> to get some idea what the general developer pool thinks. >=20 > I've already commented on this in December 2007 [1], and my opinion > hasn't changed. >=20 >> 1) Status quo >> 2) EAPI in file extension >> 3) EAPI in locked down place in the ebuild >> a) >> b) new subdirectory like ebuilds/ >> c) .ebuild in current directory >=20 > Acceptable for me would be 1) and 3c). I have also stated my opinion before. But I agree with Ulrich. -Joe