From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LbczU-0005OP-NN for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 23 Feb 2009 15:45:08 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B8002E0457; Mon, 23 Feb 2009 15:45:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from castor.sshunet.nl (castor.sshunet.nl [145.97.192.41]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9391AE0457 for ; Mon, 23 Feb 2009 15:45:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by castor.sshunet.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62B8E57C010 for ; Mon, 23 Feb 2009 16:45:06 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at castor.sshunet.nl Received: from castor.sshunet.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (castor.sshunet.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xs3fCidcuhos for ; Mon, 23 Feb 2009 16:45:06 +0100 (CET) Received: from [145.97.223.57] (57pc223.sshunet.nl [145.97.223.57]) by castor.sshunet.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Mon, 23 Feb 2009 16:45:06 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <49A2C476.6070807@gentoo.org> Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 16:44:54 +0100 From: "Marijn Schouten (hkBst)" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20081231) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Should that file be a License ? References: <49A01BEC.8080700@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <49A01BEC.8080700@gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: b3a435c3-9282-4242-971b-9cd7529390bc X-Archives-Hash: ba3aaf42887057b9bcc05fb2d50b19f6 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Mounir Lamouri wrote: > Hi, > > I was writing a trivial version bump for net-voip/gnugk-2.2.8 (bug > #258518) but upstream added a file named p2pnat_license.txt (see > http://dpaste.com/123376/) This file looks to authorize gnugk project > (and users) to use p2pnat technology. gnugk is already licensed under > GPL-2 and I was wondering if this new file should be considered as > another license and if it has to be in the LICENSE line ? In this case, > should the file be added like he is in the gnugk tarball or should it be > "templatized" like most licenses ? > > Thanks, > Mounir > That paste is gone/expired. Marijn - -- Sarcasm puts the iron in irony, cynicism the steel. Marijn Schouten (hkBst), Gentoo Lisp project, Gentoo ML , #gentoo-{lisp,ml} on FreeNode -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkmixHYACgkQp/VmCx0OL2wURgCff8WSLE9PHXfO/HI+GdrE1W3J 0/kAoLpB4oFEwOx5Dk+ceo70vCueZgbk =hKRC -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----