From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-34408-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1LatfQ-0000Jz-3m
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 21 Feb 2009 15:21:24 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CC95BE01FB;
	Sat, 21 Feb 2009 15:21:22 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from yx-out-1718.google.com (yx-out-1718.google.com [74.125.44.154])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB43DE01FB
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 21 Feb 2009 15:21:22 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by yx-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 3so537361yxi.46
        for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 21 Feb 2009 07:21:22 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from
         :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:x-enigmail-version:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=45dtjS7w0xzKKxiqWoyWSG0PBkSCxDNjpAt6YqbOxsE=;
        b=E0EZPUk+uSRtmJ2HKLSOgS+sW8feegNZskO8URF4Mop0/DUde9lX0omzmF+S+jfQKr
         jbccfEcOUxF3AH00L0sAfs6fJqV3DO2CNz7R4r/uhQLrYPEGnreIcdl4RgCj52DHzTOs
         8R+yynQMfTpk4m4LLOhtCjSrzJ3LXliAKR0CM=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject
         :x-enigmail-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=J1TiEuvAuUglJGsVFLmDSXIoRYv5fxrxeCOAGJfbP2ifuthsV72IuwI4ucu3jY6DiC
         iLcwqKpziUGVxG34/Snkb45Ujn60/YNrMUr7V1ZGiGrMypGYtdGanIX05nfZSV33js5F
         kEh0wEAP7grQbBwt2CM31/SLYfSERCYpHy9U4=
Received: by 10.231.20.2 with SMTP id d2mr2755290ibb.37.1235229681945;
        Sat, 21 Feb 2009 07:21:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?10.0.0.200? ([72.0.219.39])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id s31sm7367920qbs.34.2009.02.21.07.21.20
        (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5);
        Sat, 21 Feb 2009 07:21:21 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <49A01BEC.8080700@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 10:21:16 -0500
From: Mounir Lamouri <mounir.lamouri@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20090213)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Should that file be a License ?
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Archives-Salt: b2539cbf-4755-470d-8569-73ff5002253d
X-Archives-Hash: 36e3f14be1c22cda8cbadf235351a075

Hi,

I was writing a trivial version bump for net-voip/gnugk-2.2.8 (bug
#258518) but upstream added a file named p2pnat_license.txt (see
http://dpaste.com/123376/) This file looks to authorize gnugk project
(and users) to use p2pnat technology. gnugk is already licensed under
GPL-2 and I was wondering if this new file should be considered as
another license and if it has to be in the LICENSE line ? In this case,
should the file be added like he is in the gnugk tarball or should it be
"templatized" like most licenses ?

Thanks,
Mounir