From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LWWtQ-0005Jt-1P for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 09 Feb 2009 14:13:48 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B0942E0241; Mon, 9 Feb 2009 14:13:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp03.tky.fi (smtp03.tky.fi [82.130.63.73]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 63BF3E0241 for ; Mon, 9 Feb 2009 14:13:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [82.130.46.209] ([82.130.46.209]) by smtp03.tky.fi (SMSSMTP 4.1.9.35) with SMTP id M2009020916134425645 for ; Mon, 09 Feb 2009 16:13:44 +0200 Message-ID: <49903A9B.5020601@gentoo.org> Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2009 16:15:55 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?UGV0dGVyaSBSw6R0eQ==?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; fi; rv:1.8.1.19) Gecko/20090111 Thunderbird/2.0.0.19 Mnenhy/0.7.6.666 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] DIGESTS metadata variable for cache validation References: <498758E6.5080609@gentoo.org> <1234045916.24784.1373.camel@localhost> <498E17E6.8060407@gentoo.org> <20090208221814.722f573a@snowmobile> <498F5FF5.50203@gentoo.org> <20090208224721.4193ca45@snowmobile> <498F64D4.4080303@gentoo.org> <20090208231010.4b2ebe3b@snowmobile> <498F6A7A.2060408@gentoo.org> <20090208233008.6350dd40@snowmobile> <498F6D60.7080500@gentoo.org> <49902202.1080607@gentoo.org> <20090209135922.796d6256@snowcone> In-Reply-To: <20090209135922.796d6256@snowcone> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7 OpenPGP: url=http://users.tkk.fi/~praty/public.asc Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigBB92EB6EAD113950038161F5" X-Archives-Salt: 03f996cb-671e-4177-9496-cd50298bc6bd X-Archives-Hash: d2fe700312c2e1b18fa44db7200259f3 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigBB92EB6EAD113950038161F5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Mon, 09 Feb 2009 14:30:58 +0200 > Petteri R=C3=A4ty wrote: >> It would probably be useful to provide a central rsync infra for >> overlays where overlay maintainers could subscribe their overlays to >> and the machine would pull in their VCS and generate the metadata for >> them. >=20 > How much do you trust overlay maintainers? >=20 It shouldn't be that hard to sandbox the overlays for cache generation. Trust should be much more of an issue to people actually installing stuff from overlays. Adding new overlays to the server would probably have to be manual. Regards, Petteri --------------enigBB92EB6EAD113950038161F5 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkmQOpsACgkQcxLzpIGCsLRuVwCfUN4N0Mqj8vqGfy+ldwRS02BZ yswAn3ZdJZDhcjHhIfl3Gj53JQXuB/ex =sAmH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigBB92EB6EAD113950038161F5--