From: Zac Medico <zmedico@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] DIGESTS metadata variable for cache validation
Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2009 15:40:16 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <498F6D60.7080500@gentoo.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090208233008.6350dd40@snowmobile>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Sun, 08 Feb 2009 15:27:54 -0800
> Zac Medico <zmedico@gentoo.org> wrote:
>>> Which is offset and more by the massive inconvenience of having to
>>> keep track of and store junk under version control.
>> I think you're making it out to be worse than it really is. Like I
>> said, I think we have a justifiable exception to the rule.
>
> If you start encouraging this approach, are you prepared to make
> Portage warn extremely noisily if a repository-provided (as opposed to
> user generated) cache entry is found to be stale?
Sure. Otherwise, it's confusing for the user when dependency
calculations take longer than usual for no apparent reason.
- --
Thanks,
Zac
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAkmPbV8ACgkQ/ejvha5XGaN24ACg9LFy8dag9/riCwODjknQV/Ic
0koAn00PP5WJBo5UwMR6iATwfFOipTi6
=sOk8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-02-08 23:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-02-02 20:34 [gentoo-dev] [RFC] DIGESTS metadata variable for cache validation Zac Medico
2009-02-06 9:55 ` [gentoo-dev] " Markus Ullmann
2009-02-07 1:13 ` Zac Medico
2009-02-07 22:31 ` [gentoo-dev] " Tiziano Müller
2009-02-07 23:23 ` Zac Medico
2009-02-08 8:07 ` Tiziano Müller
2009-02-08 8:59 ` Zac Medico
2009-02-08 11:51 ` Tiziano Müller
2009-02-08 20:36 ` Zac Medico
2009-02-08 21:48 ` Tiziano Müller
2009-02-08 22:14 ` Zac Medico
2009-02-08 22:18 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2009-02-08 22:43 ` Zac Medico
2009-02-08 22:47 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2009-02-08 23:03 ` Zac Medico
2009-02-08 23:10 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2009-02-08 23:27 ` Zac Medico
2009-02-08 23:30 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2009-02-08 23:40 ` Zac Medico [this message]
2009-02-09 12:30 ` Petteri Räty
2009-02-09 13:59 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2009-02-09 14:15 ` Petteri Räty
2009-02-09 14:18 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2009-02-09 14:21 ` Rémi Cardona
2009-02-09 20:19 ` Zac Medico
2009-02-09 18:43 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2009-02-09 20:02 ` Zac Medico
2009-02-09 15:22 ` Tiziano Müller
2009-02-09 19:55 ` Zac Medico
2009-02-10 12:20 ` Brian Harring
2009-02-10 12:52 ` Nirbheek Chauhan
2009-02-10 20:55 ` Zac Medico
2009-02-11 9:00 ` Brian Harring
2009-02-11 10:01 ` Zac Medico
2009-02-14 13:18 ` Brian Harring
2009-02-14 20:16 ` Zac Medico
2009-02-15 22:51 ` Zac Medico
2009-02-15 23:15 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2009-02-15 23:26 ` Zac Medico
2009-02-15 23:30 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2009-02-15 23:56 ` Zac Medico
2009-02-16 0:06 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2009-02-16 0:48 ` Zac Medico
2009-02-16 0:53 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2009-02-16 0:54 ` Zac Medico
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=498F6D60.7080500@gentoo.org \
--to=zmedico@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox