-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> I spotted that too but didn't remember putting it in black and white. :)
> 
> The order ("first maintainer as assignee" or "first maintainer/herd as
> assignee") is open to discussion and I think this is the proper forum to
> have that discussion.

It seems sensible to me.  I would've thought that being more specific
would surely be better?  Splitting them up means those who are mostly in
charge of a package see it easily, and it's also then easier to spot
packages that only have a herd, rather than them getting lost in all the
packages that do have individual maintainers...

I've attached a quick patch that should fix up assign.py to add all the
herds on the end.  Since the order of the second item onwards doesn't
matter, all herds are added at the end.  If we do need an ordering (like
maintainer1, herd1, maintainer2, maintainer3, herd2) then it'll need a
more complex patch...

Hope this helps,

Mike  5:)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAklg7p8ACgkQu7rWomwgFXoDwACcCDBD5Dj/F//7Bxq+zIB1/GPZ
UHQAnA82J6UxuHva7uEXmEL9wuNDMkIk
=SRmT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----