From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DBC18139694 for ; Mon, 5 Jun 2017 11:38:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 43308E0D29; Mon, 5 Jun 2017 11:38:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from forward1m.cmail.yandex.net (forward1m.cmail.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:b030::18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DC62BE082F for ; Mon, 5 Jun 2017 11:38:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp2h.mail.yandex.net (smtp2h.mail.yandex.net [84.201.187.145]) by forward1m.cmail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 70B26210A9 for ; Mon, 5 Jun 2017 14:38:22 +0300 (MSK) Received: from smtp2h.mail.yandex.net (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp2h.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id DFB9C78218A for ; Mon, 5 Jun 2017 14:38:13 +0300 (MSK) Received: by smtp2h.mail.yandex.net (nwsmtp/Yandex) with ESMTPSA id yS7hk56tTG-cCb4E8ta; Mon, 05 Jun 2017 14:38:12 +0300 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client certificate not present) X-Yandex-Suid-Status: 1 0 From: "Vadim A. Misbakh-Soloviov" To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: www-client/phantomjs and dev-ruby/poltergeist Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2017 18:38:11 +0700 Message-ID: <4954231.qRABUJGCyh@note> In-Reply-To: <20170605230605.099dfdc3@katipo2.lan> References: <1496646687.9038.9.camel@gentoo.org> <20170605230605.099dfdc3@katipo2.lan> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Archives-Salt: 64d96120-628f-46e6-b066-b24f252887dd X-Archives-Hash: 3e4beaecc2a8f8d0e1ca89e5131b4437 > Can phantomjs be simply masked for a longer period until the development > world has had an opportunity to catch up? Just exactly what I thought. Although, in-tree version is obsolete anyway, and upstream made few next releases with brain-exploding buildsystem, so I just pushed 9999 version to my "public sandbox" overlay, and happy with it on the projects that depends on phantomjs. By the way, headless chrome, well, work a bit different in comparsion with "analogs" (including wkhtmlto{img,pdf}), so, it needs much more time than a month to get full analogs. So, I'm disagree with monthly dropping in this context too (well, I disagree with the idea. As I just said, I by myself is in safe from being affected by it).